[Planning and Zoning]
[00:00:09]
>> IT IS 7:00. I WILL CALL THIS MEETING FOR TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2023 TO ORDER. AND FIRST ITEM IS ROLL CALL. COMMISSIONER
>> COMMISSIONER SCHWARTZ? >> HERE.
>> COMMISSIONER BOYER? >> HERE.
>> COMMISSIONER LAWYER? >> HERE.
>> COMMISSIONER MYER? >> HERE.
>> AND COMMISSIONER HUDSON. THAT'S ME. ALSO HERE. NEXT UP IS PUBLIC COMMENT. WE'LL USE THE TABLE. BE ADVISED YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. WE HAVE A LIGHT TO INDICATE WHEN THE TIME IS AND WE'RE NOT SUPER DISTRICT SINCE WE DON'T HAVE THAT TIMER.
>> I'VE GOT IT. >> I'M MARK LIONS. MY WIFE AND I ARE THE PROUD PARENTS OF AN AUTISTIC SON. HE IS 25-YEARS-OLD AND LIVES WITH US. WE NEED YOUR HELPFUL OUR COUNTRY AND UNDERGOING A SEVERE SHORTAGE OF HOUSING FOR ADULTS.
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IS HOUSING THAT INCLUDES LONG TERM SERVICES THAT SUPPORTS [INDISCERNIBLE] THE SHORTAGE OF [INAUDIBLE] AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 AND THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLMSTEAD DECISION OF 1999. [INAUDIBLE]
>> ELSE SIGNED UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? ALL RIGHT. THEN WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM FOUR, CONSENT AGENDA. WHICH INCLUDES ITEM 4.1, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MEETING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SCHEDULED PLANNING & ZONING MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 3RD, 2023. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE --
[00:05:04]
FOUR HAD THE TWO. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MEETING MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR SCHEDULED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 7, 2023. ITEM 4.3, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PROPOSED HUTTO CROSSING PHASE FOUR SECTION 17 FINAL PLAT,.571 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF LAND LOCATED NORTHWEST OF CARL STERN DRIVE AND CHRIS KELLY BOULEVARD. AND 4.4, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON BELL YARD SCHMIDT'S CREEK FILE PLAT 22.736 ACRES, MORE OR LESS OF LAND, ONE SINGLE FAMILY, FOR-RENT RESIDENTIAL LOT, LOCATED OFF OF ED SCHMIDT BOULEVARD AND FUTURE LIVE OAKEXTENSION. >> I WOULD LIKE TO PULL 4.4 FOR
DISCUSSION. >> ARE THERE ANY OBJECTIONS TO PULLING 4.4? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE, ARE THERE ANY
OTHER ITEMS TO BE PULLED? >> 4.3.
>> 4.3. ANY OBJECTIONS TO 4.3 BEING PULLED? ANY OTHER? THEN I'LL ENTERTAINMENT A CONSENT AGENDA ON FOR ITEMS 4.1 AND 4.2.
>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 4.1 AND 4.2 AS
>> UP A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LAWYER AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOYER. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION, COMMENT ON THE
MOTION? >> WASN'T THERE AN ERROR IN THE
NUMBER? >> THE CORRECTION HAS BEEN PASSED ALONG, YES. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? THEN I WILL CALL FOR VOTE, ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE? ALL OPPOSED, SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES 7-0. NEXT IS 4.3, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PROPOSED HUTTO CROSSING PHASE FOUR, SECTION 17, FINAL PLAT, 0571 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF LAND, LOCATE NORTHWEST OF CARL STERN DRIVE AND CHRIS KELLY
BOULEVARD. >> IT'S A SINGLE LOT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS IS SO CONSTRUCTION CAN START PRIOR TO THE REST OF THE LOT DEVELOPING SO THEY HAVE GOOD ACCESS INTO THE LOT FOR THEIR LEASING BUILDING. SO THIS IS WITHIN THE HUTTO CROSSING PUD IN AN AREA THAT WILL ULTIMATELY HAVE SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND IT REALLY IS JUST HALF AN ACRE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY.
>> QUICK QUESTION. DID WE SEE THIS LAST MONTH? OR WAS THIS A
SIMILAR LOCATION, DIFFERENT LOT >> IT WAS ADJACENT 70 TO THIS.
>> LAST MONTH WAS -- >> YEAH. I WAS LOOKING AT IT.
>> YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THESE A LOT.
>> I HAD TO GO BACK AND COMPARE JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM. OKAY.
COMMISSIONER MEYER? >> YEP, JUST TWO SMALL
>> SO ONE SAYS SILO DRIVE. IS IT ALIGNED WITH THE DRIVEWAY THAT GOES INTO I BELIEVE A RETIREMENT COMMUNITY? IS IT ALIGNED WITH THAT DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE STREET?
>> OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, I BELIEVE SO, BUT THIS SHOULD ALSO BE -- I THINK THIS IS WHERE THERE'S NO --
>> I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT IT IS. I REMEMBER WE MADE A SITE PLAN. THEY WEREN'T EXACTLY ACROSS FROM EACH OTHER.
>> ON THE OTHER PLAT? >> ON THE ENTIRE PLAT FOR ALL THE HOUSES, WE REVIEWED THAT FOUR OR FIVE MONTHS AGO.
>> YEAH. THAT'S WEST. I KNOW 416 IS WEST OF HERE. WEST NOT HERE. BUT IT'S WEST OF THIS PLAT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT
NOW. >> I DO REMEMBER THAT DISCUSSION. I DON'T THINK IT LINED UP, BECAUSE WE WERE MAKING SURE THAT THEY KNEW THAT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A RESTRICTED ACCESS AND IT WOULD BE -- OKAY. WE'RE OKAY WITH THE OFFSET OF
>> AND THEN MY OTHER QUESTION, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A REPEAT COMMENT OR IF THERE'S A REASON FOR IT, SO GENERAL NOTES TWO, THE SECOND SENTENCE SAYS THE CITY OF HUTTO ASSUMES NO OBLIGATIONS FOR INSTALLING WATER OR WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT TO SERVE THE SITE. NOTE FOUR DAWES CITY OF HUTTO ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSTALLING ANY WATER AND WASTEWATER
[00:10:03]
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE SITE. DO WE NEED TO HAVE BOTH OF THOSE IN THERE? THAT A STANDARD IN AND THEN IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES? DO WE NEED TOKEEP BOTH OF THOSE THERE? >> I THINK THESE ARE SPECIFIC NOTES TO THIS PUD BECAUSE OF THE 380 AGREEMENT. THESE ARE THE STANDARD WORDS I'M USED TO SEEING.
>> OKAY. . AND GOING BACK TO THE DRIVEWAY, NO ISSUES WITH THE OFFSET? MEDIUM BOUND? -- MEDIAN BOUND?
>> THERE'S A MEDIAN IN THE AREA, THE FURTHEST WEST DRIVEWAY OF
THE SENIOR LIVING FACILITY. >> AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S RIGHT IN THAT AREA. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM?
>> MORE OF A COMMENT THAT I THINK I'VE ALSO BROUGHT UP BEFORE. SO NORMALLY WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PIECE, THERE'S MANY TIMES WE'LL SEE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES ON HIS A FRONT BEING ROAD. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO BUILD THEMSELVES. IS THERE A REASON THEY HAVEN'T PROVIDED WHAT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE? I KNOW WE HAVE THE ROAD WIDTH BUT THAT'S USUALLY A REQUIREMENT FOR I KNOW CERTAINLY ROWS.
>> BECAUSE OF THE EXTRA PIECE, WE DON'T HAVE A NAME FOR THE SIDE WORD THAT SAID ACREAGE. IT WON'T ALL BE SILO. SINCE THIS PORTION IS THIS PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TECHNICALLY SAY I THIS ONE WHILE THEY BUILD THIS. WE'LL GET THE FINAL PLAT THAT ADJOINS EVERYTHING THAT WE'LL GET ALL THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS CALLED OUT EXACTLY. ON SILO, IT SAYS 58 FEET. WE KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE 58 THROUGH.
>> WHICH IS HELPFUL. I KNOW THAT WAS JUST AN ABNORMAL THING
NORMALLY, THERE'S -- >> WE USUALLY DON'T JUST GET PIECES OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EITHER. THIS ORIGINALLY CAME IN AND WHY ARE WE DOING THIS? BUT IT MAKES SENSE THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE THIS UNDER CONSTRUCTION SO THERE IS NO CONSTRUCTION HERE, SO WHEN THE LEASING OFFICE GOES IN, THIS IS ALL COMPLETELY DONE, BECAUSE THIS WILL LIKELY BE THE LEASING SPACE FOR NOT ONLY THIS LOT, BUT ALSO WEST OF THAT FOR BOTH OF THOSE FOR REPRESENTS. THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS IS AS CLEAN AS POSSIBLE SO YOU'RE NOT HAVING THE ROADWAY UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE YOU'RE TRYING TO GET A BUILDING UP AND RUNNING.
>> AND IT MAKES SENSE SINCE THERE WON'T BE AN ENTRANCE TO THE LEASING OFFICE OFF OF CARL STERN. IT'S HELPFUL TO HAVE IT
ESTABLISHED? OKAY. THANKS. >> OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON 4.3? THEN I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON 4.3. "MOVE THAT WE REQUEST APPROVAL FOR 4.3 TO CITY COUNCIL. -- I MOVE THAT WE REQUEST APPROVAL FOR 4.3 TO CITY COUNCIL. ALL OF THAT.
>> I SECOND THAT. >> I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOYER AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEE TO APPROVE 4.3 AS PRESENTED. ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? HEARING NONE, I WILL DIAL IN A VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE? ALL OPPOSED, SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES 7-0.
NEXT IS 4.4. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON BELL YARD SCHMIDT'S CREEK 22.736 ACRES MORE OR LESS OF LAND, ONE SINGLE FAMILY FOR-RENTS RESIDENTIAL LOT LOCATE OFF OF ED SCHMIDT BOULEVARD AND FUTURE LIVE OAK EXTENSION.
>> OKAY, COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS A PROPOSAL, AGAIN, YOU MAY RECALL THAT YOU SAW THIS ON A PRELIM, BUT ALSO IN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THAT CAME THROUGH BACK IN 2021. SO THIS IS JUST PLOTTING THAT FIRST SECTION OF THE SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT DEVELOPMENT, AND THEN ALSO A PORTION OF THAT LIVE OAK EXTENSION WHERE IT'S ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ACROSS THE WAY FROM HERE. JUST TO THE WEST OF US, BUT THIS WILL BE FOR THE
REMAINDER OF THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY. >> SO I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS BASED ON FOLLOW-UP FROM THE PUD DISCUSSION IN 2021. FIRST WAS SITE TRIANGLES. THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT WE NEEDED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE ADEQUATELY CALCULATING THESE BASED ON THE HIRE SPEEDS, BECAUSE ORIGINALLY, WE WERE BASING THEM ON THE LOWER SPEEDS ON THE EXTENSION -- HIGHER SPEEDS. DO YOU KNOW IF
THAT WAS ACCOMPLISHED? >> BECAUSE OF THE CHURCH.
>> YEAH. IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE CHURCH.
>> YES. >> SOME OF THAT WILL COME INTO PLAY BECAUSE OF THAT SOUTHERN LOT, NOT NORTH OF THE LIVE OAK
[00:15:03]
EXTENSION AND SOME OF THAT REALLY ONLY COMES INTO PLAY ONCE WE START LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN. BUT WE STILL ARE VERY AWARE, AND THAT IS A CODE REQUIREMENT AS WELL.>> OKAY. AND THEN THE SECOND PIECE, JUST TO VERIFY, AND IT MIGHT BE THE SITE PLAN STAGE AS WELL. VERIFIED AT THE TIME, AS THEY'RE BUILDING OUT LIVE OAK THAT THEY'LL BUILD IT OUT AT THE FULL FIVE LANE WIDTH AND POTENTIALLY JUST USE THE EXTRA SPACING FOR PARKING OR BIKE LANES OR SOMETHING AT THE MOMENT. SO MAKING SURE THAT THAT IS STILL OCCURRING? AND AS A FOLLOW-UP, I KNOW THAT WAS ALSO THE PORTION TO THE EAST WAS ALSO SUPPOSED TO BE THAT WAY AND I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S BEING
DEVELOPED THAT WAY. >> THE EAST SHOULD BE. I THINK IT WAS THREE THERE, SO TWO, PLUS THE CONTINUOUS IN THE MIDDLE PLUS ON STREET PARKING AND BIKE LANES AND OTHER THINGS.
>> YEAH. >> THIS PORTION WILL HAVE TO MATCH UP WITH THAT. THIS IS THE ONE TO REVIEW, AS IS THE TIA.
SO ALL OF THAT'S GOING TO SAY, ARE THERE ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE DONE EITHER TO EXCHANGE OR ED SCHMIDT AS ELL SO THAT'S ACTUALLY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL WITH THIS PLAT.
>> PERFECT. SOUNDS LIKE IT'S LINING UP WITH THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS. AND JUST A CLARITY NOTE. I THINK WHEN THIS FIRST CAME IN AT ONE POINT AS PRELIMINARY, THAT COMMERCIAL CORNER, THE 2.599-ACRE CUTOUT THERE WAS ACTUALLY PART OF THIS PLAT. IS THERE A REASON THAT'S NOW BEEN PULLED OUT AS SEPARATE
WILL IT BE COMING LATER? >> IT WILL BE. THEY'RE PLOTTING IT IN PHASES. THEY'LL HAVE ESSENTIALLY THREE. THEY'LL DO THE SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENTS RIGHT NOW WITH THE PUD OR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. THE SOUTH SIDE OF LIVE OAK IS STILL THE SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT DEVELOPMENT. THAT WILL COME IN SEPARATELY AND COMMERCIAL CAN COME IN SEPARATELY WHEN THEY'VE GOT USERS. I KNOW THIS IS QUICKER. ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WE MAY GET A REZONING IN IN THE PUD OVER THERE. THAT'S ANOTHER REASON. IS IT GOING TO BE RESIDENCE IN THE ARE WE GOING TO CHANGE THAT IN SOME WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM? JUST TRYING TO HOLD ON
WITH THAT. >> PERFECT. SOUNDS GOOD. I KNOW WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT EASE MINTS THERE AND WE CAN LOOK AT THAT LATER. PERFECT. THANK YOU.
>> SO I KNOW THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING IN TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT SOME POINT THERE, BUT THAT'S NOT ANY TIME SOON, SO THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS NOT GOING TO BE --
>> WELL, IT SHOULDN'T BE RACING ACROSS THAT STREET. WE'LL KNOW CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ONCE WE GET INTO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETINGS, ONCE WE HAVE FULL SITE PLANS AND WE'RE STARTING TO RELEASE DEPARTMENTS, BUT PUT THE PLOT UP HERE. SO FOR NOW, I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER ON THE LIGHTS, ONLY BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THAT FINALIZED TIA TO SEE WHAT THOSE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE GOING TO BE OR IF IT'S IN ADDITION TO. THIS ONE COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE. THAT'S ANOTHER ONE THAT WE'RE WORKING THROUGH, ONLY BECAUSE THIS ACTUALLY, I THINK, PREDATES THE ANNEXATION OF THIS THE TIF ORDINANCE ACTUALLY PREDATES THE ANNEXATION. THERE'S A FEW WE'RE HAVING TO CHECK WITH LEGAL TO SEE IF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ACTUALLY APPLIES, AND THAT'S A CONVERSATION HAPPENING CURRENTLY BETWEEN LEGAL AND ENGINEERING. SO THAT CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THESE THINGS WILL HAVE TO BE FINALIZED PRIOR TO PLAT RECORDATION, SO WE'LL HAVE ALL OF THOSE ANSWERS PRIOR TO EVER
REPORTING A PLAT. >> OF COURSE. THAT JUST MAKES ME NERVOUS HOW FAST YOU CAN GO DOWN THAT ROAD IN CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC TRYING TO PULL OUT ON THERE.
>> AND JUST INVOLVED WITH TRAFFIC ON THE ROAD RIGHT NOW IS
LIKE -- >> IN THE MIDDLE OF A TIA RIGHT
NOW? >> WE JUST HAVE CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS JUST WITH THE WAY THAT THE TIF ORDINANCE WAS WRITTEN IN 2018 AND THE AREA THAT WAS CALLED OUT. THE DEVELOPER HAD QUESTIONS ON -- OR THE DEVELOPERS HAVE QUESTIONS ON IF
IT APPLIES OR NOT. >> ALL RIGHT. SO WE'RE GOING -- WE'VE RECEIVED PART ONE. THERE'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE THREE PARTS TO THIS. IS THE FILE PLAT THE APPROVAL, ET CETERA, GOING TO BE ALL ONE PIECE OR ARE WE GOING TO GET IT
IN THREE SNEEZES. >> IT WILL BE PHASED. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPEARED TO BE PHASED, FOR THE MOST PART.
>> SO CAN WE APPLY THE COMPLETE [INAUDIBLE], ET CETERA, TO PHASE ONE, OR DO WE HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL PHASE THREE?
>> ONE, BECAUSE IT WOULD BE -- WE CONDITIONED IT WITH THIS PLAT, SO THAT IT WOULD BE -- AND THEN IF ANYTHING CHANGES IN THAT PUD BASED ON THE TIA, IF IT COMES IN AS THE PUD WAS ADMIT, LIKE SOUTH SIDE IS THE SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT AND THE TIA IS BASED ON THAT. IF SOMEBODY COMES IN TO CHANGE THAT, WE WOULD WANT AN UPDATE TO THAT TIA AS WELL.
>> OKAY, PERFECT. >> IF THEY WANT A SIGNAL, DO WE HAVE PROPORTIONALITY SO THEY'LL ONLY HAVE TO PAY WHAT THEIR
IMPACT IS IN. >> WE'LL HAVE FOR SEE, THERE'S GOING TO BE CITY PARTICIPATION OR OTHER DEVELOPERS IN THE AREA
[00:20:02]
THAT WOULD ALSO HAVE AN IMPACT WITH THAT INTERSECTION, OR IT COULD THEN ALSO BE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES IF THOSE HAVE NOT OTHERWISE BEEN SPENT ELSEWHERE FOR CIP.>> OKAY. >> THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THEY CAN GET THAT TO BE BETTER.
>> AND LAST QUESTION ON THE LIGHT AT THAT INTERSECTION AT EMORY FARMS. I SEEM TO REMEMBER IT BEING ON THE CIP LIST. WAS THAT THE CASE OR AM I MISREMEMBERING IT?
>> I HONESTLY HAVE NO IDEA OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
>> IS CIP LIST HAD THAT SECTION OF ROADWAY ON IT, BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S SPECIFIED WHAT IT'S FOR.
>> IT WAS TALKING ABOUT DOING ASSESSMENT ON THAT SECTION, BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S SPECIFIED. I THINK WHEN THE DISCUSSION AND THE CIP WAS, I THINK IT WAS KIND OF BETWEEN WHETHER IT WAS BEING WIDENED OR SIGNALS, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS --
>> OKAY. >> EVENTUALLY, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE WIDENED AND MEDIUM PUT IN. EVENTUALLY.
>> I THOUGHT IT WAS THE ORIGINAL DISCUSSION, WIDENING THE MEDIUM IS IT GOING TO BE WIDENND MEDIANS? IS IT GOING TO HAVE A LIGHT? IS IT GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN.
>> GOTCHA. >> WHAT IS THE SCHEDULED TIMEFRAME FOR THAT BUILD-OUT OR EXTENSION ON LIVE OAK?
>> EVERYTHING IS IN REVIEW RIGHT NOW, AND THE EASTERN MOST PORTION IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. SO I'M THINKING --
>> I'M JUST CURIOUS, WHEN IS IT GOING TO EXTEND TO ED SCHMIDT? IF THERE'S NOT A SPECIFIC DAY, WHAT'S THE TIME FRAMEST FAT?
>> IT'S BASED ON WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO DO. IT'S NOT A CITY PROJECT. IT'S IN REVIEW RIGHT NOW. IF WE WERE GOING TO MOVE AS QUICKLY AS THAT EASTERNMOST PORTION, IT SHOULD BE THIS YEAR. BUT THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO GET ALL OF THOSE OTHER THINGS DETERMINED TO SEE WHAT THOSE IMPACTS ARE GOING TO
BE. >> SO SINCE THEY'RE DIVIDING THIS INTO THREE PORTIONS, I KNOW THAT THIS WHOLE THING, WE HAD ISSUES WITH TREES. WE HAD SIDEWALK CONVERSATIONS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE NONE OF THAT'S BEING CHANGED OR MODIFIED SINCE WE'RE DIVIDING THIS PROJECT OUT INTO THREE PORTION, BECAUSE THE
ORIGINAL CAME -- >> SO IT WON'T, BECAUSE A LOT OF THOSE CONVERSATIONS, IF IT WAS DONE ON THE PRELIM, LET'S GO BACK A LITTLE BIT FURTHER, IF IT WAS DONE ON THE ZONING ITEM, THAT CARRIES INTO THE PRELIM. IF IT WAS ON THE PRELIM, IT CARRIES INTO THE FINAL PLAT, BECAUSE WE'LL HAVE TO MAKE IT
GOOD WITH THE PROCESSING FOR IT. >> IS AND THE SIDEWALKS, BECAUSE IT DOES INCLUDE THIS LINE OF, THERE IS A PORTION OF ED SCHMIDT SIDEWALK QUESTIONS. SO THAT PART OF THOSE SIDEWALKS WILL BE ON THIS PLAT AND PART OF THEM WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY AND
WE'LL GET THAT CONNECTIVITY. >> CONSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL STREETS WITHIN AND BOUNDING THE [INAUDIBLE]
>> WE HAD THAT ONE IN PRELIM. >> WE HAD LONG CONVERSATION
ABOUT HIS ALL THAT. >> OH, YEAH. ALL RIGHT. WELL, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM?
>> THE ONLY THING I HAVE, JUST ONE TYPO. NOTE 22.
>> ONLY ONE? >> ONLY ONE THAT I COULD FIND.
IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE THAN, BUT IT'S THAT,.
>> GOT IT. THANK YOU. >> THAT N32 FEET.
>> SOMEONE DID SPEECH-TO-TEXT. >> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM? HEARING NONE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION?
>> I'LL MAKE A NOTION APPROVE ITEM 4.4 AS WRITTEN, WITH ONE MINOR CORRECTION. TO CHANGE THAT. I'M SO SORRY. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 4-4 WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE TIA WILL BE FILE EYES AND HAD APPROVED PRIOR TO PLAT RECORDATION AND
ONE MINOR GRAMMAR ERROR. >> SECOND.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> AND THAT IS GIVING THAT SO WE
CAN DISCUSS MOTION RIGHT NOW. >> LET ME DO THE FORMAL PART.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEE AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LAWYER.
ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? >> SO WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION, THAT'S GIVING US APPROVAL IF THE LIGHT, PART OF THE LIGHT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, THAT'S BASICALLY HELPING?
>> YES. >> TO FUND THEIR PART OF THE
>> COOL. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? THEN I WILL CALL FOR VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ALL OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
THE MOTION PASSES, 7-0. NEXT IS ITEM FIVE. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT. AND SHAWN OUT RIGHT NOW, ACTUALLY
[00:25:06]
WORKING VIRTUALLY, BECAUSE HE AND HIS WIFE WELCOMED A BEAUTIFUL LITTLE GIRL, THEIR SECOND DAUGHTER. SO YOU WILL LIKELY SEE HIM BACK NEXT MONTH, BUT IT WAS REALLY EXCITING, AND SHE WAS A -- SHE CAME INTO THE OFFICE TWO DAYS AGO. GOODNESS.SHE'S ADORABLE AND SHE BREATHES CUTE. SHE'S GOT A FAN CLUB NOW AND THEN OTHERWISE, WE DO HAVE THAT SPECIAL CALLED MEETING BEFORE THIS MONTH ON THE 21ST, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A FEW MORE PROJECTS THAT WEREN'T QUITE READY FOR THIS. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TWO SHORTER MEETINGS. AL AND WE HAVE REQUESTED THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE ONE ON APRIL 18TH FOR A FILE PLAT FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IT'S FOR THE EVO WAS ANNOUNCED.
SO THAT WHOLE ONE. WE'RE TRYING TO GET THAT INCLUDE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. I DON'T KNOW IF WE WILL NEED THAT ONE. IF WE DON'T NEED IT FOR SOME REASON, WE'LL OBVIOUSLY ALERT YOU, BUT WE MAY JUST FOR THAT PLOT SO THAT WE CAN GET EVERYBODY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND MOVING IN THAT FORWARD DIRECTION. OTHERWISE, IF YOU SEE AN E-MAIL CANCELING IT, YOU HAVE A GREAT NIGHT OFF, BUT RIGHT NOW, IF YOU COULD HOLD THAT ASIDE AND IF YOU COULD MAKE THAT COMMITMENT TO BE HERE, THAT WOULD BE LOVELY, AND THEN HOPEFULLY FOR MAY AND JUNE, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE SOME OTHER THINGS COMING OUT CITYWIDE, I'M HOPING WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIAL CALLED MEETINGS FOR THOSE NEXT TWO MONTHS.
>> IF YOU DON'T MIND, WE CAN DO WHAT WE DID LAST TIME FOR THE TEAR OF MEETING. IS EVERYONE OKAY WITH APRIL 18?
>> AND IF NOT, LET ANGEL KNOW. >> ANGEL ALREADY SENT OUT AN
E-MAIL. >> WHY WOULD I REPLY? I'M
ALWAYS HERE. >> YOU WERE LATE TODAY.
>> I TEXTED HIM AND HE TALKED IN IMMEDIATELY. LIKE DON'T
RESPOND. >> THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. I KNOW THAT IT'S GOTTEN BUSIER IN OUR SCHEDULES AND THEN ESPECIALLY AT THE P&Z LEVEL. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH. AND IF YOU DID NOT SEE, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS OFFICIALLY APPROVED SINCE OUR LAST MEETING, AND THAT IS ONLINE. WE'VE GOT THE APPENDIXES. WE'VE GOT THE PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE ENTIRE PROJECT. WE WANT TO BE AS TRANSPARENT AS POSSIBLE.
HERE IS ALL THE COMMENTS WE'VE GOT. HERE'S HOW THIS CAME TO FRUITION. HERE ARE THE RESPONSES TO THOSE COMMENTS AS WELL. AND THEN WE HAVE THE ADOPTED, THE FULL ADOPTED, CLEAN
VERSION UP ONLINE NOW AS WELL. >> SO A QUESTION ON SINCE YOU BROUGHT THAT UP. I KNOW THAT PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS SUGGESTING REVAMPED ZONINGS I KNOW, I'M ASSUMING THOSE DON'T IMMEDIATELY TAKE EFFECT AT APPROVAL OF THE COMP PLAN.
>> THEY DON'T. SO WE ARE ACTUALLY WORKING ON AN RF Q, SO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THAT WILL BE POSTED, AND THAT WAS THE UDC PERSON, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PORTION HAD BEEN FUNDED ALREADY. SO WE HAVE THE FUNDS ALREADY APPROVED THROUGH COUNCIL AND IT'S JUST BEEN A HOLDOVER. SO WE ALREADY HAVE THE FUNDS FOR IT. I JUST HAVE TO GET THE RF Q OUT AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SEARCH THROUGH FIRMS AND ACTUALLY GET STARTED ON IT. THE IF I REMEMBER IT THAT DID THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACTUALLY GAVE ME ABOUT 68 PAGES OF WHERE OUR CURRENT UDC WENT WRONG COMPARED TO OUR CURRENT COMP PLAN, BECAUSE I DID A FULL DIAGNOSTIC REPORT, AND THAT WAS A DELIGHT TO READ. SO -- IT WAS REALLY HARD. I KNEW IT DIDN'T REALLY ALIGN, BUT 68 PAGES OF NONALIGNMENT, WE KNOW WE'RE GOING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I THINK WE HAVE TO GET THERE WITH THE UDC, AND THEN ALSO, JUST MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S SCHEDULES ALIGN. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WE'RE BRING INNING ALL OF THE REVIEWERS, ESD FOLKS ON FIRE, AND THOSE REVIEWERS AND GETTING A REALLY GOOD GROUP TOGETHER TO WORK THROUGH IT AND SOME PROFESSIONALS AS WELL IF ANYBODY HAS ANY SPARE TIME TO HELP US THROUGH THE LANDSCAPE PORTION AND CERTAINLY I THINK OUR STREETS THAT WERE DISCUSSED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND HOW THAT LOOKS MOVING FORWARD, AND THEN ONE THING THAT WE TOSSED AROUND, IF WE CAN GET IT ALSO DONE AT THE SAME TIME IS HAVING OUR ENGINEERING STANDARDS UPDATED AT THE SAME TIME IF WE HAVE THE FUNDING FOR IT. SO I THINK IT'S REALLY GOING TO TURN -- UDC IS DEFINITELY MY TOP FOCUS, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I WENT FOR FOR FUNDING DURING THAT BUDGET YEAR, BUT IF THERE IS A WAY TO GET THE ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO ALSO BE UPDATED AT THE SAME TIME SO THAT EVERYTHING IS JUST ONE FELL SWOOP, WE ARE GROWING ASK FOR THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'LL HAVE THE FUNDING OR IF THAT WILL BE A BUDGET ITEM COMING UP FOR THIS FOLLOWING YEAR. IT MAY BE PRETTY BACK TO BACK. I JUST DON'T KNOW IF I
HAVE ENOUGH RIGHT NOW. >> SO IF WE DO START THE UDC LATER THIS YEAR OR SOMETHING, HOW LONG ESTIMATED BEFORE IT
[00:30:01]
WOULD BE OFFICIALLY CHANGED AND IT WOULD BE THE NEW UDC THAT WECAN START OPERATING FROM? >> I MEAN, I'M VERY OPTIMISTIC, ALMOST TOXICALLY SO. I WOULD SAY BY THE END OF THE YEAR, BUT BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAYS AND THE THE BEGINNING OF THE UPCOMING YEAR. I HAVE TOSSED AROUND THE IDEA ONCE WE HAVE SOMEONE PICKED, MAYBE WE DO THAT IN CHUNKS. SO THERE ARE AREAS THAT WE KNOW ARE JUST DIAGNOSTICALLY OUT OF SYNC * EXTENSIVE PLAN.
-- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. DO WE UPDATE THOSE FIRST? WE WANT TO LOOK HOLISTICALLY, NOT JUST IN A VACUUM ON CERTAIN SECTIONS. AND THE ONLY OTHER ONE I WOULD SAY, WE'RE NOT JUST GOING TO TAKE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT I THINK THERE WAS EVEN A REALLY GOOD COMMUNITY SURVEY THAT THE RESULTS WERE SHARED AT LAST COUNCIL MEETING, SO I THINK TAKING SOME OF THOSE WITH THE REMARKS THAT WERE ALSO IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THEY ACTUALLY LINED UP REALLY WELL, BUT MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE ALSO LOOKING AT NOT JUST DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT WE COLLECTED, THAT WAS A LONGER PROCESS, BUT ALSO WHAT WE GOT FROM THOSE COMMUNITY SURVEYS AND MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE DOING THE RIGHT THINGS WITH UDC TO NOT ONLY ENACT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT ALSO MAKING SURE WE'RE JUST ENACTING WHAT PEOPLE SAID THEY WANTED OUTSIDE OF THAT PROCESS.
>> PERFECT. >> AND THEN ALL COUNCIL, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE STRATEGIC PLANNING AND I'M GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR THINGS ARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH WHAT THEY ALSO SEE THEIR VISION
>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THAT'S OLIVIA GOT FOR
YOU. >> OKAY. WELL -- THAT'S OLIVIA
GOT FOR YOU. >> WITH THAT, WE'LL ADJOURN THIS MEETING OF PLANNING AND ZONING
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.