Jun 15, 2023 City Council

[1. CALL SESSION TO ORDER]

[00:00:27]

MAYOR CIDER MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> COUNCILMAN MCKENZIE. >> HERE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER KOLAR. >> NEXT IF YOU WILL RISE WE WILL BE LED IN INDICATION BY PASTOR BOBBY PRUITT OF THE HUTTO BIO

UNTIL BIBLE CHURCH. >> LET'S PRAY.

>> FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR OUR CITY AND THESE MEN AND WOMEN WHO GIVE THEIR TIME AND SERVE SO FAITHFULLY.

GOD I ASK THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THEM IN THE AREAS OF THEIR LIVES THAT WE DON'T SEE BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT TELEVISED AND YOU BLESS THEM AND THEIR MARRIAGES AND YOU BLESS THEM AND YOUR FRIENDSHIP AND THEIR FAMILIES THAT THEY WOULD BE THE MEN AND WOMEN, THE MOM AND DADS THAT THEY WANT TO BE.

THAT YOU WOULD GROW THEM AND MENTOR THEM AND GOD YOU WOULD ORDER THEM AS THEY HONOR THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HUTTO AS THEY SEEK TO SERVE THEM WELL AND GOD WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD MAKE YOURSELF KNOWN TO THEM IN A UNIQUE WAY.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE CITY FOR THE GROWTH THAT WE ARE SCENE WITH THE NEW FACES AND NEW PEOPLE AND WE PRAY WE WOULD BE A WELCOMING AND LOVING COMMUNITY FOR ALL YOU SEND US, GIVE US WISDOM, WE PRAY. WE PROMISE YOU WILL IF YOU WOULD SIMPLY ASK. WE ASK FOR YOUR WISDOM THROUGH CHRIST OUR LORD WE PRAY. AMEN.

>> PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH THE BEAUTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE TEXAS, ONE STATE, UNDER GOD, ONE

INDIVISIBLE. >> NEXT IF THE COUNCIL WILL JOIN THE UPFRONT FOR CONFIR PROCLAMA. MEMBERS OF OUR DNI BOARD AND

[5.1. Juneteenth Proclamation]

>> HOW IS IT GOING? >> HOW ARE YOU?

>> NOT TOO BAD. NOT TOO BAD.

>> THIS IS A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING JUNETEENTH, WHEREAS AS A NATION WAS CONCEIVED ON JULY 4, 1776 WITH THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE THE CLASSIC STATEMENT BEING WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR.

JANUARY 1, 1863 USING HIS WAR POWERS AS PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN SIGNED THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION PROVIDING ALL PERSONS HELD AS SLAVES WITHIN ANY STATE OR DESIGNATED PART OF THE STATE SHALL BE THEN AND THEN FORWARD FOREVER FREE THE EMANCIPATION MADE THE PERMANENT SLAVERY A UNION WARGAME AND PROVIDED LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE NANCY PATIENT OF 4 MILLION SLAVES AS UNION ARMIES ADVANCED. WHEREAS JUNE 19, 1865.

TWO AND HALF YEARS LATER MAJOR GENERAL GORDON GRANGER ARRIVED IN GALVESTON TEXAS AND ANNOUNCED THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR AND SLAVERY. HIS STATEMENT READS THE PEOPLE OF TEXAS ARE INFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCLAMATION OF THE EXECUTIVE OF THE UNITED STATES ALL SLAVES ARE FREE.

THIS INVOLVES THE QUALITY OF PERSONAL RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF PROPERTY BETWEEN FORMER MASTERS AND SLAVES IN THE CONNECTION HERE TO FOR EXISTING BETWEEN THEM BECOMES BETWEEN EMPLOYER AND HIGHER LABOR. WHEREAS TEXANS BEGIN A CELEBRATION OF JUNETEENTH IN 1866 WITH COMMUNITY EVENTS SUCH AS PARADE, COOKOUTS, PRAYER GATHERINGS, MUSICAL PERFORMANCES AND HISTORICAL CULTURAL READINGS.

SOME PURCHASE LAND FOR CELEBRATIONS SUCH AS THE AS

[00:05:04]

THEREFORE WE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTTO DO HEREBY PROCLAIM JUNE 19, 2023 AS JUNETEENTH IN THE CITY OF HUTTO ENCOURAGES ALL CITIZENS TO CELEBRATE THE RICH HISTORY OF THIS HOLIDAY WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS OF THE JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION AT ADAM OR DEAN PARK ON SATURDAY JUNE 17 TO BE HOSTED BY THE LOCAL NONPARTISAN NONPROFIT GROUP BLACK FAMILIES

OF HUTTO. >> BEFORE I TURN THIS OVER, I WANT TO SAY THE PUBLIC REALLY I GO TO JUNETEENTH AND READ UP ON JUNETEENTH AND I WAS GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AT THE SECOND ONE AND I DID SOME RESEARCH AND THERE'S A LOT OF DEBATE IN THE COUNTRY IN TERMS OF HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT.

IF YOU REALLY LOOK AT IT AND YOU TAKE ALL EMOTION ASIDE YOU WILL FIND IN ALL REALITY THE UNITED STATES WAS FOUNDED AS A SLAVE COUNTRY WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION IT GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FORMATION HAD TEXAS BECAME A STATE, HOW AUSTIN, STEPHEN AUSTIN LEFT INTO MEXICO FOR THE INTENT PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING SLAVES AND I LEARNED RECENTLY THE PANHANDLE IN OKLAHOMA IS THERE. ANYBODY WONDER WHY THAT'S THERE, IS NOT JUST A SQUARE IT WAS TO HELP MISSOURI COMPROMISE TO HELP TEXAS STAY AS A SLAVE STATE AS A BROTHER STATESMAN.

ALL THE LITTLE THINGS AND PEOPLE SAY THIS NEVER HAPPENED OR THAT'S NOT WHAT HAPPENED. IF YOU LOOK WHAT HAPPENED THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS YOU CAN LEARN WITH THE BLACK FAMILIES OF HUTTO HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO AGGRESSIVELY TO THE JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION AND THINK THEY DO IN THE CITY THERE ABLE TO EDUCATE US ON THINGS WHERE THEY CAN MAKE THINGS BETTER AND ALSO NOT GO BACK TO THE WAY THAT WE WERE AND NOT SHY AWAY FROM HER HISTORY BUT LOOK AT IT AND SAY HOW DO WE DO BETTER AS A PUBLIC.

WITH THAT IF YOU WANT TO TELL DETAILS ABOUT SATURDAY.

>> THIS IS A COMMUNITY EVENT. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE FEEL IS CELEBRATION SAME AS INDEPENDENCE DAY JULY 4.

WHERE ADAM OR DEAN PARK MORGAN EVER FREEDOM MARCH.

THE FREEDOM MARCH IS HOT BUT SO WAS WORKING IN A PLANTATION.

MARCH SYMBOLIZES HOW FAR WE'VE COME AND HOW FAR WE NEED TO GO.

THIS IS NOT A BLACK THING THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSION THING, THIS IS AN EVERYBODY THING WE ALL NEED TO SALUTE WITH THE ENDING OF SLAVERY IN THE UNITED STATES IT WAS ADVANCE FORWARD FOR HUMANITY IN OUR COUNTRY SO WE HAVE THE MARCH AT 1230 ORGANA PARK AT THE PARK AT ADAM OR DANE PARK AND WE HAVE AIC BUSES SPONSORED BY THE YMCA THAT WILL SHUTTLE EVERYONE SURVEY ELEMENTARY WHERE WE WILL WALK TO BACK TO THE PARK AND HAVE A CELEBRATION. IT IS A JUBILEE AND SOMETHING THAT WE CAN HAVE A FESTIVAL WE HAVE LINE DANCING THE KIND THAT YOU DO GROWN FOLKS. SO IF YOU LEARN THESE THINGS SHALL BE THE HEAD OF THE WEDDING.

YOU CAN GO TO ANY WEDDING AT ANY CELEBRATION AND THE LIKE HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW TO DO THAT. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT AND ELIZABETH CORKER WHO DOES AFRICAN SAFARI.

SHE DOES AFRICAN HISTORY CLASSES IN FOLKTALES AND SONGS AND DRUMS. WE'RE GOING TO FOOD VENDORS, BURGER SNOBS AND FRIED RIBS AND A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER STUFF.

IT IS FOR EVERYONE. IT IS OUR HISTORY IN AMERICA AND FOR ALL OF US TO CELEBRATE. WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL COME, I AM REMEMBERING YOUR FACES AND WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL BRING SOMEONE ELSE AND WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL SUPPORT BLACK FAMILIES OF HUTTO.

WE ARE GRASSROOTS BASICALLY DOING THE VOLUNTEER.

ALL WE DO HAVE OTHER AREAS SCHOLARSHIPS TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TOMORROW AND WE DO THE CEMETERY PROJECT AND WE JUST NEED PEOPLE. THIS IS OUR COMMUNITY, URS AND

[00:10:03]

YOU ON SATURDAY. >> THE PARADE STARTS AT ONE.

>> WE WILL HAVE SIGNS, IT IS GOING TO BE HOT.

WE ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO BRING UMBRELLAS IT'S AN AWESOME THING TO SEE. WE HAVE SIGNS AND WE SING SONGS AND CHANTS AND WE HAVE THE YOUTH LEADING US WHICH IS AWESOME AND WE HAVE A LOT OF THE NEIGHBORS HANGING OUT NOW THERE READY FOR US TO COME. WE WERE GOING AROUND TELLING HIM WE WERE COMING AND THE LIKE OH YOU'RE COMING, WERE COMING

AGAIN. >> WE LOVE TO SEE EVERYBODY THERE. BRING YOUR TENTS, CHAIRS AND THE FESTIVAL IS TO - 6:00 O'CLOCK, DON'T MISS OUT.

>> JUNETEENTH. >> THINKING.

[5.2. Independence Day Proclamation]

>> NEXT IF ED WRINKLE COMMANDER OF THE RICHER DATE OF AND MELISSA SOSA VICE COMMANDER, NOT HERE, OKAY.

THIS IS A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING INDEPENDENCE DAY WHEREAS OVER 200 YEARS AGO A GROUP OF VISIONARIES, OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SET OUT TO ESTABLISH A NEW INDEPENDENT NATION UNLIKE ANY OTHER BASED ON THE PHILOSOPHIES OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. AFFIRMING AND SAFEGUARDING EACH CITIZEN RIGHT TO PURSUE THEIR OWN DESTINY AND HAPPINESS.

AND WHEREAS THE SITE OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ON JULY 4, 1776 BY THE SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS SECURED AND PERMANENTLY CEMENTED. THESE PRINCIPLES BY THE FOUNDING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND PROVIDED A FRAMEWORK FOR A BALANCED AND ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT IN SOCIETY THAT PRIORITIZE THE FREEDOM AND WELL-BEING OF THE CITIZENRY, NOT ONLY FROM THE OUTSIDE FORCES BUT THEIR OWN GOVERNING BODIES.

AND WHEREAS OUR NATION'S FOUNDERS DEMONSTRATED THEIR LOVE FOR LIBERTY, IMPROVE THEIR DEVOTION BY RISKING EVERYTHING, BEING WILLING TO LAY DOWN THE LIVES FOR THE FREEDOMS UNDERSCORED IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND THE SAFEGUARDS THAT WOULD BE DETAILED IN THE CONSTITUTION.

THROUGHOUT OUR HISTORY AMERICANS HAVE BEEN UNWAVERING IN THEIR EFFORTS TO BUILD AND PRESERVE A COUNTRY OF LIBERTY, PEACE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL. AND WHEREAS HER PEOPLE AND FREEDOM HAVE BEEN AND CONTINUE TO BE DEFENDED DAILY BY THE SELFLESS AND DEDICATED MEN AND WOMEN OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. WE WILL ALWAYS DEBT OF HONOR AND GRATITUDE TO THE HEROES WHO MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE FOR EACH ONE OF US. WE RECOGNIZE THE SERVICE OF ALL OF OUR VETERANS ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE MEMBERS, RESERVISTS, NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS AND THEIR FAMILIES.

OUR MILITARY MEMBERS BRAVERY AND SACRIFICE SERVES TO CARRY FORWARD THE PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS AND THE CONTINUED FREEDOM AND PEACE.

AND WHEREAS THIS FOURTH OF JULY WE COMMEMORATE THE SITING OF AN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND A CELEBRATE OUR EXCEPTIONAL LIBERTIES LET US TAKE TIME TO REFLECT ON THE SIGNIFICANCE A TRUE COST OF OUR FREEDOM. THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTTO DUBAI PROCLAIM JULY 4, 2023 AS INDEPENDENCE DAY IN THE CITY OF HUTTO AND ENCOURAGE ALL CITIZENS TO CELEBRATE THE BIRTH OF A GREAT NATION AND TO HONOR THOSE WHO HAVE DEFENDED AND CONTINUE TO DEFEND OUR STATE AND COUNTRY.

>> ON BEHALF OF ALMOST FELLOW LEGIONNAIRES AT THE POST 302 AS

[00:15:06]

[6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS]

IT'S COMING FROM COMMUNICATIONS BUT COVERING COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT CIP OUTREACH. WE WANT YOU TO PAY ATTENTION.

YOU CAN GO TO THE WEBSITE AND LOOK FOR THE SURVEYS TO ANSWER THE FEW EASY QUESTIONS. WE WANT TO KNOW HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THE CITY'S COMMUNICATIONS EFFORT SO FAR TO KEEP YOU INFORMED OF THE MAJOR ROAD PROJECTS, THE OTHER CIP WORK WHICH IS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

THIS IS A TOPIC THAT HUTTO WINS, IS NOT THE PLURAL WHATEVER THAT WORD IS. WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MOST CONCERNED ABOUT SO WE LAUNCHED THE CAMPAIGN LAST YEAR THAT IS CALLED BUILDING THE FUTURE TO KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED. THERE IS A NUMBER OF OUTREACH TOOLS, VIDEOS, FLYERS, ADVERTISING SIGNAGE, NEWS MEDIA STORIES, WE ALSO HAD A WEBPAGE WITH INTERACTIVE MAPS AND WE STARTED DOING CIP UPDATES MONTHLY AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. WE ARE INTERESTED IN WHERE PEOPLE ARE GETTING THEIR INFORMATION AND IF YOU'RE NOT SEEING IT OR YOU MIGHT PREFER TO LOOK.

IF YOU WILL GO TO HUTTO TX. TX.GOV/SURVEYS AND FILL OUT THE SURVEY THAT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

AND FOR THE COMMUNITY I WOULD LIKE TO ANNOUNCE WE ARE DECLARING STAGE ONE OF THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN IN EFFECT.

THOSE MAY REMEMBER LAST YEAR TOWARD THE END OF SUMMER WE COMPLETELY REWORKED THE DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AND PART OF THAT WAS SETTING THE DIFFERENT STAGES AND WHAT THOSE MEAN, STAGE I IS VOLUNTARY. IT IS ABOUT RAISING AWARENESS.

WE ARE APPROACHING OUR 75% LEVEL OF HOW MUCH WATER WE CAN PRO PROVIDE. THAT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO IRRIGATE MORE BECAUSE IT'S GETTING HOTTER SO ON AND SO FORTH SO WE ARE DECLARING STAGE I AND ASKING PEOPLE TO PAY ATTENTION, EDUCATE YOURSELF.

THIS APPLIES TO THE FOLKS OF CITY OF HUTTO WATER CUSTOMERS.

IF YOUR WATER CUSTOMER IN MANVILLE OR JONAH OR ANOTHER ENTITY. OUR RESTRICTIONS DO NOT APPLY TO THE WATER PROVIDERS. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN RESTRICTIONS. MANVILLE HAS DECLARED STAGE II.

PAY ATTENTION TO THAT. WHAT DOES IT MEAN STAGE I BEING VOLUNTARY IS ABOUT AWARENESS BUT IS TO GET YOU INTO THE HABIT TO PAY ATTENTION IF YOUR COMMERCIAL WATER CUSTOMER YOU WOULD WATER ON MONDAYS AND FRIDAYS AND IF YOU ARE A RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER AND YOU HAVEN'T EVEN ADDRESSED HE WOULD WATER ON SUNDAYS AND THURSDAYS DURING THE DESIGNATED TIME FRAMES AND IF YOU HAVE AN AUDIT WOULD BE SATURDAY AND TUESDAY.

IT ALLOWS US TO SPREAD OUT WHEN PEOPLE ARE IRRIGATING THEIR YARDS AND IT HELPS WITH THE CONSERVATION EFFORTS.

ALSO THE TIME LIMITATION IS BEFORE 10:00 A.M. AND AFTER 8:0T OF THE DAY. WELCOME TO TEXAS WHERE IT GETS HOT IN THE SUMMER. OTHER THINGS TO PAY ATTENTION TO CERTAINLY ARE IN STAGE I BUT THOSE OF THE KEY COMPONENTS AND IT'S ABOUT EDUCATION, WILL THE CITY THE OUT WRITING TICKETS, NO, IT IS ABOUT AWARENESS. WHEN WE MOVE TO STAGE II IT BECOMES MANDATORY THAT YOU FOLLOW THE CALENDAR AND THE RESTRICTIONS. IF YOU ARE NOT SURE WHO YOUR WATER PROVIDER IS WE HAVE THE DIFFERENT WATER PROVIDERS

[00:20:02]

IT IS A TOKEN FEE TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE RESERVE AND DON'T SHOW UP. IT'S NOT MEANT TO BE A REVENUE GENERATOR. REGISTRATION CLOSES TOMORROW AT FOUR SO THEY CAN GET FINAL HAD CAL MAKE THE FINAL ARRANGEMENTS IF YOU GO TO HUTTO/GOLF AND GO TO PART PARKS AND RECREATION PR AGEE, PARTY. JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION WE HEARD ABOUT, RE-SUMMARIZING THE. THAT EVENT STARTS AT 1230 TABLE COURTNEY, ORGANIZE AND GO OVER TO THE ELEMENTARY AND BEGIN THEIR MARCH AND HAVE AN OPENING CEREMONY, VENDOR AND FOOD AND MUSIC AND ALL THE THINGS THAT WAS MENTIONED BEFORE.

THAT REMINDS ME THE COUNCIL DID RECOGNIZE JUNETEENTH AS AN OFFICIAL CITY HOLIDAY, CITY FACILITIES WILL BE CLOSED ON MONDAY IN OBSERVANCE OF JUNETEENTH.

LASTLY BECAUSE WE WON'T MEET AGAIN BEFORE THE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION WE HAVE TO NOTE JULK AMPHITHEATER STARTING AT 5:00 O'CLOCK RUNNING TO 930 AT WHICH POINT THE FIREWORK SHOW SHOULD FIRE OFF AND WE WILL HAVE LIVE MUSIC LOCAL VENDORS, FOOD TRUCKS, KID ACTIVITIES AND ENDING THE NIGHT WITH FIREWORKS.

THAT IS THE EVENTS COMING UP BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT COUNCIL

[7. PUBLIC COMMENT]

>> THINK USER. >> NEXT WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT.

OUR REGION AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.

THE LIGHT WILL START OFF GOING WITH 30 SECONDS IT'LL GO TOGETHER THEN READ YOUR TIME WILL BE UP.

FIRST UP RUDY PEREZ. >> RUDY PEREZ.

I'M HERE TO SPEAK ON AN IMPORTANT ISSUE BUT I HAD SECOND THOUGHTS. I FOUND SOME DISTURBING NEWS AND HUTTO FROM CITIZENS. I WILL SEE HOW THIS MEETING GOES TONIGHT AND I'LL WAIT ON THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS HUTTO HE MIGHT THINK USER.

>> I BELIEVE THAT IS ALL THE PUBLIC COMMENTS.

[8.1. Consideration and possible action on Resolution No. R-2023-129, approving the municipal services agreement for the proposed annexation of the Hutto Data Center Campus Annexation tract, 224.50 acres, more or less, of land located southeast of US79 and CR132 (Ashley Bailey)]

CR 132. >> BEFORE ASHLEY SPEAKS, SOMEONE HAS LOGGED INTO TEAMS. I JUST SOLD A SECOND AGO.

>> MAYBE IT IS AMANDA BROWN. >> CAN AMANDA HEAR US?

>> YES I HEAR YOU, CAN YOU HEAR ME?

>> GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL ASHLEY BAILEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR. AS ALWAYS WE HAVE FUN EXCITING PROJECTS FOR YOU, THIS IS A MENACE OF PULL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE HUTTO DATA CENTER OTHERWISE SKY BOX.

WITH THAT AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION WE HAVE TO DO MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BEFORE WE CAN ACCEPT PROPERTY IN THE ITEM IS ALSO ON THE AGENDA. COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

[8.2. Conduct a public hearing and possible action on Ordinance No. O-2023-032 Approving the Annexation of the Hutto Data Center Campus Annexation tract, 224.50 acres, more or less, of land located southeast of US 79 and CR 132 and to Establish the Base Zoning as LI (Light Industrial) (First Reading) (Ashley Bailey)]

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> AYE. >> THE MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

[00:25:03]

ZONING OF LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. >> FOR THIS ITEM YOU MAY RECALL WE HAD A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THIS PROJECT STILL SOUTHEAST QUARTER COUNTY ROAD 132 AND U.S. 79 PRE-WAS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO FURTHER DEFINE THIS USE BECAUSE IS NOT CURRENTLY IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THAT'LL BE A PART OF THE ZONING ESSENTIALLY ONCE THIS IS ANNEXED WE WILL ZONE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE CHANGES IN THE DEFINITIONS WILL ALSO ESSENTIALLY RUN WITH THE LAND WITH THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. I WANTED TO MAKE A POINT OF THAT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION AND IS UNDER 225 ACRES TO COME INTO THE CITY FOR REALLY EXCITING DEVELOPMENT FOR DATA CENTER.

>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. >> WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:26 P.M. IS ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THE ANNEXATION, PLEASE COME FORWARD.

SEEING NO ONE. WE WILL CLOSE THE HEARING AT 7:26 P.M. AND OPEN UP TO CITY COUNCIL COMMENT OR ACTION.

OR QUESTIONS. >> LATER I MOVED TO PROVE A

POINT TO AS PRESENTED. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON, SECOND BY COUNSEL MARIE THOMPSON. APPROVING O-2023-032 AS MENTIONED. PLEASE CALL THE VOTE.

>> COUNSEL MARIE THORTON. >> AYE.

>> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. >> AYE.

[8.3. Conduct a public hearing and possible action on Ordinance No. O-2023-033 for the proposed Specific Use Permit request for the property known as 901 Ed Schmidt Boulevard, to allow a drive-through facility (UDC 10.304.10) (Ashley Bailey)]

>> MAYOR SNYDER. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN O'CLOCK. >> AYE.

>> COUNSEL MARIE THOMPSON SELECT AYE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY. >> AYE.

>> I LOST COUNT, IS THAT SIX? SMACK 6 - 0.

THANK YOU. NEXT 8 - 3 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON O-2023-033 FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 901 EDGE MITT BOULEVARD TO ALLOW A DRIVE-THROUGH

FACILITY UDC 10.304.10. >> THIS IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOOMBERG LOOP AND EDGED MITT.

THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH USE THAT IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THE ZONING DISTRICT.

YOU CAN SEE FROM THE ZONING MAP HAS A BANQUETTE RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST FOR EVERYBODY TO KNOW IT IS THIS LOT RIGHT HERE, IT DOES HAVE COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST AND MORE B1 COMMERCIAL TO THE SOUTH SO THERE IS AN INTERVENING LOT BETWEEN THIS AND THE ADJACENT BUILT RESIDENTIAL.

ONE THING TO KNOW ON THE PROPERTY BECAUSE OF WHERE IT IS IN THIS LINE, AT THIS POINT THERE WILL NOT BE A DIRECT CONNECTION TO EDGED MITT THIS WILL BE SHARED ACCESS BETWEEN ADJACENT LOTS BETWEEN ANY OTHER ACCESS WE ARE TRYING TO LIMIT THE DRIVEWAYS AND UNIFIED DEVELOPING CODE.

WITH THAT THEY WANTED TO DRIVE THROUGH AND THAT'S NOT ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THE B-1 ZONING DISTRICT SO WE HAVE TO BRING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FORWARD THIS WAS NOTICED AND WE DID NOT GET ANY FEEDBACK FROM ANYBODY FROM AN THE 600-FOOT BOUNDARY IN PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS AND IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. MARCY: ALL OPEN IT UP TO PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:29 P.M. IS ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE PERMIT FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. SEEING NO ONE.

WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:29 P.M.

OPEN THIS UP TO DISCUSSION TO THE COUNCIL.

>> ASHLEY, I SAW IN THE MEMO WHICH WAS GREATLY APPRECIATED THAT STAFF SENT A NOTICE FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTS.

WHEN WAS THAT SENSE. I GUESS MY QUESTION WHEN WAS IT SENT WERE JUST TRY TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE WAS A GOOD AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THEM TO RESPOND BEFORE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT.

[00:30:01]

ENOUGH TIME TO RESPOND. >> A GREAT QUESTION THE UDC REQUIRED IN STATE LAW REQUIRES WE HAVE AT LEAST 15 DAYS TYPICALLY WHEN THAT'S PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER FOR A POSTING ON A SUNDAY THE LETTERS WERE NOT THE PRIOR FRIDAY SO THEY GET A NEWSPAPER THIS UNIT THE SAME FAMILY GET THE NOTICE AND YOU'RE ABLE TO SEND BACK IN THE NOTICE WITH WRITTEN COMMENTS WHERE THEY CAN E-MAIL THEIR COMMENTS TO STAFF.

WE TRY TO MAKE IT AS EASY AS POSSIBLE FOR ANYBODY TO RESPOND

IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. >> ALL OF THAT IS DOCUMENT IT?

>> ABSOLUTELY. >> IT USED TO BE WE ONLY NOTICED 300 FEET OR 200 AND WE EXTENDED 600 WAY ABOVE WHAT STATE

REQUIRES. >> GREAT, THANK YOU.

>> I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS IF I READ THIS RIGHT L POLO RICOH WHICH I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT IS. IN MAKING ASSUMPTIONS.

WHAT THREW ME OFF AT 6300 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT IN RETAIL MULTITENANT BUILDING HAVE YOU SEEN ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO SHOW US WHAT THIS WILL LOOK LIKE I FAST-FOOD WITH TUMOR SUITES ON

IT? >> I'VE GOTTEN AS FAR AS THIS IN THE REVIEW WHEN THEY GAVE US THE SEP WE DON'T HAVE ELEVATIONS FOR ANYTHING WE CAN SHOW YOU THAT WE FUN AND THIS IS NOT SHOWING ANY WALLS THAT HAVE BEEN FIRE RATED FOR DIFFERENT SUITES.

I'M THINKING THEY COULD HAVE SOMETHING ELSE, I KNOW THERE IS ONE IN ROUND ROCK THAT WAS ONE USER WE CAN CERTAINLY FIGURE

THAT OUT. >> 179.

I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING ON ANY PLANS THAT WOULD SHOW THIS CAN

BE ANY SUITES OUT OF THIS. >> ON THE PLANS I NOTICED THE TRASH CANS WERE OFF ON EDGE SMITH.

I'M WRONG, THEY ARE ON-SITE. I GOT CONFUSED I THOUGHT THAT

WAS PLANNED NORTH. >> JUST SO EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS IS VERY PRELIMINARY THERE ARE ACTUALLY ISSUES ON THIS WE WERE TO GIVE THEM BACK THERE IS NOT ENOUGH LANDSCAPING AREA AND WHERE THE DRAINAGE AND MIGHT BE PROBLEMATIC BECAUSE WE WANT CROSS ACCESS. THIS IS JUST TO SHOW WHERE THE DRIVE-THROUGH WOULD POTENTIALLY BE BUT PLEASE DON'T TAKE IT AS IT WAS APPROVED BY DEVELOPING SERVICES THAT.

>> THEY'RE PROPOSING A 6-FOOT RETAINED WALL BETWEEN THEM IN

THE NORTH? >> CORRECT AT THIS POINT.

>> WE WILL DETERMINE IF THAT IS GOING TO GO THROUGH.

>> IT LOOKS LIKE THE DRIVE-THROUGH GOES ALMOST UP TO THE PROPERTY LINE, I COULD NOT TELL HOW MANY FEET OFF OF THE PROPERTY LINE BUT IS THERE NOT A SETBACK?

>> THERE WOULD BE WE JUST WANTED TO SHOW YOU.

>> THIS IS WHAT THEY TURNING WITH HER SEP BUT WILL WE SAW IT AND STAFF DOG INTO IT THEY DEFINITELY HAVE CODE ITEMS THEY WILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH. WE NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE LANDSCAPE ON THE SIDE AND WE HAVE SHARED LANDSCAPE FROM COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL AND THE BEST PLACE TO THINK ABOUT THAT IS IN THE STRIP BETWEEN CHRIS KELLY WITH THE WENDY'S AND POPEYES WITH THE PARKING AND LANDSCAPING AREA BETWEEN THE USES SO WE WOULD DESIRE TO SEE SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

>> I DIDN'T KNOW THEY HAVE TO ADD SOMETHING TO THE SEP.

>> THIS IS VERY PRELIMINARY TO SHOW THAT THEY COULD FIT A

DRIVE-THROUGH ON THE SITE. >> OKAY.

>> THERE IS ONE PAGE OF ELEVATION ON PAGE 114 OF THE

PACKET. >> 114.

>> LOOKS LIKE IT'S OFFSET TO THE LEFT AND OPTIONS FOR TWO OTHER

BUSINESSES. >> AGAIN THOSE OF NOT BEEN APPROVED. IT'S JUST FOR THE STP.

>> TO HAVE AN IDEA. >> IS JUST AN IDEA THAT WHEN WE STARTED SEEING IT WERE LIKE FOR YOUR SITE PLAN APPLICATION YOU

CAN HAVE SOME COMMENTS. >> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, ACTION

OR BREAKTHROUGH? >> JUST WITH THE ACCESS NOT BEEN DIRECT, AT THE CONVENIENCE STORE ON THE CORNER ALREADY SEES A LOT OF CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC AVOIDING THE TRAFFIC LIGHT IN THE TRAFFIC AND ALSO THE PROBLEM OF CARS GOING NORTHBOUND GOING INTO THE TURN LANE AND ACCELERATING TO THE PART THAT IS STRIPED OFF BUT NOT WALKED THE PEOPLE BLOW RIGHT THROUGH THEIR ENTERING THE NIC NEAR ACCIDENTS FOR SOMEBODY WAITED TILL THEY WERE LEGAL AND 70TH WAS FLYING UP TO THE MIDDLE LANE THERE'S A LOT OF

TRAFFIC CONCERNS. >> THAT IS BEING LOOKED AT I SAW

[00:35:01]

BACKS UP. >> WITH THE ONLY EXIT BEEN THROUGH THE CONVENIENCE STORE. IF THEY GET BACKUP IS GOING TO

CREATE AN ISSUE. >> POTENTIALLY THEY COULD EXTEND THIS SO THEY HAVE A SOUTHERN EXIT THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL LOT THAT IS SOMETHING WE WILL HAVE TO WORK ON.

>> UNTIL THE READY TO DO SOMETHING.

>> THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE AGREEMENTS TO BUILD IT FIRST.

>> ALRIGHT. >> ANYTHING ELSE?

>> MAYOR I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE 8.3 AS PRESENTED TO WE NEED TO SPECIFY WITH ANY STUFF FROM PNC OR IS THAT INCORPORATED THE MARKETS ESSENTIALLY INCORPORATED BECAUSE DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES HAVE TO BE GREATER THAN 100 FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT THINGS OF THAT NATURE IF YOU WANT TO INCLUDE THOSE BUT

ASSERT INCLUDED IN THE UDC. >> ON MOVE TO APPROVE AS

PRESENTED. >> MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM

GORDON, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> HEARING NO SECOND.

THE MOTION DIES. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR

[8.4. Conduct a public hearing and possible action on Ordinance No. O-2023-034 Approving the Annexation of the Schmidt's Fields Tract, 46.7 Acres, more or less of Land and to Establish the Base Zoning as MF and B2 (Multiple Household and General Commercial) located northeast of the northeast corner of Limmer Loop and Ed Schmidt (First Reading) (Ashley Bailey)]

>> FOR THIS ITEM YOU MAY RECALL YOU SAW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING UNDER THE SAME NAME FOR SMITHFIELD. IT DID HAVE COMMERCIAL AND THE REST IS A SINGLE-FAMILY FOR RENT WITH BROOKSIDE CONNECTING THROUGH TO COUNTY ROAD 119 OR ED SMITH BOULEVARD.

THIS IS A KETCHUP ITEM BECAUSE WE CHANGED OUR PROCESS SO NOW HEARING THE ANNEXATION. IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND IT IS VOLUNTARY AND THE MENACE OF BOTH SERVICE WAS ALREADY APPROVED SO THAT HIS ONLY REAL DIFFERENCE THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE MSA ON THE SAME AGENDA ON A PRIOR AGENDA AND COMING FORWARD WITH

THE PRIOR HEARING ANNEXATION. >> OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:37 P.M. IS ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO COME UP AND SPEAK REGARDING THE ANNEXATION, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. SEEING NO ONE.

WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:38 P.M. AND OPEN THIS UP FOR DISCUSSION WITH COUNSEL OR ACTION.

>> MAYOR I MOVED TO APPROVE 8.4 AS PRESENTED.

>> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN THOMPSON, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND. >> SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? HEARING NONE.

PLEASE CALL THE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> SCHNEIDER.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN CLARK.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

>> MAYOR IF YOU WOULD INDULGE ME I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF WE COULD WAVE A SECOND READING BECAUSE A PUD IS ON FOR SECOND READING SO THE ZONING HAS GONE THROUGH TWO READINGS ALREADY TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT FOR ZONING. THE PLANNED UNIT OF ELEMENT IS

ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. >> I THINK THEY CAN.

>> THAT WOULD BE MY REQUEST IF WE COULD WAVE.

>> I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING.

>> ITS CHARTER 3.13. >> FOR CHARTER 3.13.

>> SECTION 3 .13. >> BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK

WAVING THE SECOND READING. >> WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION TO

WAIVE? >> HEARING NONE PLEASE CALL THE

VOTE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN CLARK.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

[8.5. Conduct a public hearing and possible action on Ordinance O-2023-029 amending Chapter 10 of the Hutto Code of Ordinances adopting the 2021 International Fire Code with amendments (Peter Gordon, Ashley Bailey)]

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER CEMENT AYE.

>> MAYOR KINSEY. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN THOMPSON. >> AYE.

>> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0. NEXT ITEM 8.5 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTIONS ON O-2023-029 AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE HUTTO CODE OF ORDINANCES ADOPTING THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL

[00:40:02]

IS IT LINCOLN HUDSONS? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK BEFORE

AFTER THE PRESENTATION. >> OKAY.

>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL THIS IS A REALLY EXCITING ONE IN MY TENURE IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS I THINK THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT HAS DEFINITELY CHANGED AND THIS IS AN ITEM BEING BROUGHT FORWARD BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WERE ON THE SAME PAGE AS HER COUNTERPART WHO DOES ALL OF THE FIRE PLAN REVIEW AND THE CHIEF AND THE FIRE MARSHAL ERIC WOODS IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS BUT THIS IS TO BRING THE CITY OF HUTTO IN LINE WITH THE 2021 IFC OR INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WITH THEIR AMENDMENTS ADOPTED SO WE HAVE THE SAME AMENDMENT THAT NEARS WHAT THE ESD IS DOING SO WERE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE HOW THE DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO OCCUR AND THERE'S NO THE CITY HAS US ADOPTED BUT THE ESD HAS US ADOPTED.

THIS ALSO INCLUDES VITAL PET FACILITY AMENDMENTS PRETTY RECENT AMENDMENT THAN WITH EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT SO WE WANTED THOSE INCLUDED AS WELL.

WE CERTAINLY CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND REQUIRES TWO READINGS.

IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ON THE FIRE CODE WE DO

HAVE THE REPRESENTATIVES HERE. >> OF UNDERSTAND RETURN TO MAKE SURE WHEN YOU SEE PLANS AND PERMIT PLANS THAT THEY ARE NOT CONFLICTING SO WHEN THE FIRE INSPECTOR COMES AROUND IT'S WHY WERE PERMITTING CERTAIN PLANS BECAUSE THE OPERATING OFF OF 2021 AND WE MIGHT BE 2020 OR 2019.

>> CORRECT WHEN WE ADOPTED THESE AND 2019 WE ADOPTED THE 2018 SET IN THE ESD ADOPTED THE 21 SET WINDOWS WERE ALLOWED AND THOSE REPUBLISHED. WERE LOOKING AT SOMEONE CALLS HUTTO HAS A DIFFERENT FIRE CODE AND WHAT THE ESD IS ACTUALLY REFERRING TO AND WE WOULD TELL THEM THEY MEET THE 2021 BUT THEY DO HAVE A BACKUP TO REQUIRE THEM TO.

INSTEAD WE WANT TO BE ONE MIND, ONE VOICE DRINKING OUT OF THE SAME CUP WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SO WE WANT TO ENSURE WHAT OUR ROLES ARE MERE WITH RULES AND WHAT THEIR PLANS ARE.

>> CHIEF THE WANT TO ADD? WE APPRECIATE YOU WORKING ON

THIS. >> THANK YOU MAYOR, GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL. WE'VE ACTUALLY BEEN WORKING WITH ASHES DEPARTMENT FOR QUITE A WHILE ON THIS TRAIT AS YOU REMEMBER WE HAD EXCITING INFORMATION WE BROUGHT TO YOU SEVERAL MONTHS AGO WHERE WE WILL ABLE TO GET THE CITY OF HUTTO ON ISO ONE. A KEY PART IS THE FIRE CODE.

WHAT WE ARE REQUIRED WHETHER THE ESD OR THE CITY WE HAVE TO ROUTINELY UPDATE THE FIRE CODES. BY US IN ON THE SAME FIRE CODE FOLLOWING THE SAME AMENDMENT IT MAKES IT EASIER WHEN WE DO PLANS AND WHEN OUR INSPECTORS GO OUT. AN EXAMPLE I WOULD LIKE TO USE IS THE BUILDING ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET ON THE CITY IN A BUILDING ON THE OTHER SIDE THAT IS ACTUALLY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY AND YOU HAVE PEOPLE SAYING WHY DO I HAVE TO DO SOME THIS OTHER PERSON DOESN'T HAVE TO DO WITH AND YOU ARE USING TWO DIFFERENT CODES TO DO THAT ENFORCEMENT. I WOULD SAY OUR FIRE MARSHAL OFFICE DOES A GREAT JOB. WE ARE OUT TAKING CARE OF HER CITIZENS AND HUTTO WHETHER IN GREATER HUTTO OR THE HUTTO COMMUNITY. I ALWAYS LIKE TO TELL HER FOLKS IS THESE PEOPLE THAT SAVE MORE LIVES IN THE CITY THAN ANY OF THE PEOPLE RIDING ON THE BIG RED TRUCK.

THEY GET TO THOSE ISSUES BEFORE THEY COME UP.

ONE OF THE THINGS ASHLEY RADA WAS A PET CARE FACILITY.

EVERYONE WILL REMEMBER THE DISASTER THAT HAPPENED IN GEORGETOWN LAST YEAR. WE WERE QUICK TO JUMP ON THAT WHEN I DIRECTED THE FIRE MARSHAL TO GET WOOD GEORGETOWN FIRE.

LET'S BRING THAT IN AND SEE WHAT THEY DID SO WE DON'T HAVE THE SAME THING GOING ON AND HUTTO. WE WERE QUICK TO GET BACK.

ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD? QUESTIONS WE ARE HAVING.

>> THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT SECTION 3 0 EIGHT.ONE.FOUR AND IS IS A PROVISION DOES NOT APPLY TO ONE OR TWO FAMILY BUILDING THAT'S REFINED TO ONE.FOUR SAYING IT DOES NOT APPLY TO SECTION 3 112.TWO.

I WAS CURIOUS. >> YOU KNOW YOU WERE GETTING

QUIZZED ON THE SECTION. >> USES CHARCOAL BURNERS AND

[00:45:08]

>> YOU ARE CORRECT. IT APPLIES TO MULTI-FAMILY, APARTMENT, THAT WAY THEY DON'T PUT THEM ON THEIR BALCONIES AND

CAUSE A FIRE. >> IF THEY DO IT AFFECTS THEM IN A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND ALL THEIR NEIGHBORS.

>> IFC DOES HAVE JURISDICTION OVER SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING ALTHOUGH I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A LITTLE PIECE OF.

FOR THE PUBLIC. >> ANYTHING ELSE.

THANK YOU GUYS. MS. HAWKINS?

>> GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL MY NAME IS LAKIN HUSKINS AND I LIVE IN LIBERTY HILL SEPTEMBER 18, 2021 A FIRE BROKE OUT AT THE PONDEROSA KILLING ALL 75 DOGS INSIDE.

MY HUSBAND AND I LOST OUR TWO DOGS AND NOT FIRE.

IT WAS A DEVASTATING EXPERIENCE FOR US.

THE IMMENSE SUFFERING AND PAIN WE ENDURED HAS BEEN EXCRUCIATING FOR ME AND I CANNOT LET GO OF. IT WASN'T UNTIL AFTER THE FIRE I LEARNED BECAUSE THE ANIMALS ARE CONSIDERED PROPERTY THESE BUSINESSES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BUILD OR OPERATE IN A MANNER THAT PRESERVES LIFE. THIS MEANS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, DO NOT REQUIRE TO BUILD FIRE RESISTANT MATERIALS AND NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CONSTANT SUPERVISION. THESE ANIMALS ARE SO MUCH FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE FAMILY MEMBERS THAT LEAD THEM TO BE CARED FOR. THE PRESIDENT THAT CONSIDERED ANIMALS PROPERTY WAS WRITTEN IN 1891.

THE ROLE OF ANIMALS HAS DEFINITELY CHANGED SINCE THAT TIME AND ANIMALS PLAY A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE LIVES OF FAMILIES TODAY. OUR LAWS SHOULD REFLECT ANIMAL FAMILY MEMBERS DESERVE MORE PROTECTION THAN THE AND ANIMATE OBJECT OF A BUILDING. PONDEROSA WAS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN. THERE HAS BEEN MANY DEADLY FIRES AND PET CARE FACILITIES BEFORE IT AND SENSE THEN THERE HAS BEEN NINE FIRES AND PET CARE FACILITIES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS CAUSING 59 PET DEATHS SINCE THEN.

UNTIL REGULATION ON THE FACILITIES ARE MADE INTO COUNTDOWN TO THE NEXT HORRIBLE TRAGEDY.

THIS IS AN UNSPEAKABLY HORRIBLE WAY FOR THESE ANIMALS TO DIE.

WHEN A LIVING BEING IS DEPENDENT ON OTHERS FOR CARE AND SAFETY IT MAKES THEM A VERY VULNERABLE POPULATION ONE THAT REQUIRES US TO SET REGULATIONS TO PROTECT THEM FROM HARM.

IT IS PAST TIME TO SET MINIMUM SAFETY STANDARDS FOR 24 HOUR PET CARE FACILITIES TO PREVENT MASS CASUALTIES.

INCREASING THE SAFETY REQUIREMENT FOR THESE FACILITIES NOT ONLY SECURES THE DEPENDENT ANIMALS INSIDE BUT INCREASES THE SAFETY OF THE FIREFIGHTERS TASKED WITH RESPONDING TO THE DISASTERS. THEY RISK THEIR SAFETY FOR ALL LIVES NOT JUST HUMAN LIVES. THEY DESERVE THE BENEFIT OF INCREASED SAFETY IS TO INCREASE THE ODDS OF RESCUE VERSUS RECOVERY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

>> THINK YOU I APPRECIATE YOU COMING UP.

I KNOW THAT CANNOT EVEN EASY. TO HER POINT AND MAYBE THIS IS CHIEF OR ERIC QUESTION BUT WHAT CHANGES WERE MADE AND AMENDED AFTER YOU MET WITH GEORGETOWN? STOMACH THAT IS A FIRE MARSHAL

QUESTION. >> I THINK TO HER POINT IN TEXAS DIDN'T THEY HAVE A FIRE AT A DAIRY THAT KILLED AN UNGODLY

AMOUNT OF CATTLE. >> YES, SIR.

>> BASICALLY WHAT WE DID IT MIRRORS GEORGETOWN BASED ON HOW MANY PETS THERE IS AND IT REQUIRES FIRE ALARMS OR IF YOU GO OVER A CERTAIN NUMBER OF PETS IT REQUIRES FIRE SPRING WAS TO BE INSTALLED THE TRIGGERS FROM HER SAFETY DEVICES.

>> WHAT ARE THOSE MORE THAN 100 ANIMALS YET TO PUT A SPRINKLER

IN OR MORE THAN 10. >> OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD I BELIEVE THE NUMBER FOUR FIRE ALARMS IS RIGHT AROUND 20 AND SPRINKLERS IS AROUND 70 THRESHOLD.

IT IS LESS THAN A HUNDRED. >> 'S OR ANY SUPERVISION?

>> SUPERVISION AS FAR AS? >> MONITORED, YES, SIR.

[00:50:01]

>> THINK YOU. >> ABSOLUTELY.

>>MONITORING IS WHATNUMBER STOMS ONE OF THE TWO SYSTEMS

INSTALLED. >> IF YOU READ IN THE NOTES IT SAYS RIGHT NOW AND AUTOMATIC ENGLISH SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED IF IT'S SERVING 50 OR FEWER ANIMALS AS LONG AS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET WALL AND CEILING HAVE A CLASS A FINISH MAYBE YOU CAN EXPEND WHAT THAT MEANS IN THE FACILITY IS PROVIDED WITH A SUPERVISED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS HAVE A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO CALL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IF THERE'S AN ISSUE IN WALL IN CEILING CLASS A FINISH.

>> THAT TYPE OF FINISH IS, IT INVOLVES THE SMOKE DEVELOPED AND FLAME SPREAD INDEX SO IT DOES NOT GENERATE AS MUCH SMOKE IN THE FLAME DOES NOT TAKE OFF AND RUN.

ONE EXAMPLE IS THE STATION NIGHTCLUB FIRE THAT HAPPENED QUITE A FEW YEARS AGO. THE HEAD EGG CRAKE ON THE WALL AND IT SET THE WHOLE PLACE UP IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE SO THEY HAVE TO HAVE MATERIALS THAT ARE MORE FIRE RESISTANT.

THEY DON'T BURN US FAST AND OFF GAS AS MUCH SMOKE.

>> ALRIGHT STOMACH ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> NO, SIR. >> WILL OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING AT 751. IF THERE'S ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME FORWARD.

>> WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 751.

OPEN A BACKUP FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION OR ACTION.

>> I WANT TO THANK HER FOR BRINGING THIS TO ATTENTION WE GOT THE E-MAIL ON APRIL AND I WILL WORK WITH CITY STAFF IN THE ASD ON THE AGENDA. I KNOW WE WANTED TO GET IT IN MAY, WE DO NOT MAKE THAT BUT IT'S GETTING DONE NOW FROM GOD REDOING THAT AND GRATEFUL FOR CITIZENS WHO ARE WILLING TO COME AND TALK TO THEIR ELECTED LEADERS AND GET THINGS DONE.

THANK YOU. >> WITHOUT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PROVE A POINT WHEN AS PRESENTED.

>> MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

MAYOR MAY PRO TEM GORDON HAVE O-2023-029 IS PRESENTED.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND QUESTION. >> SECOND BY COUNSEL NEVER THOMPSON. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?

HEARING ON, PLEASE CALL THE. >> COUNCILMAN RESORT IN.

>> AYE. >> COUNSEL NEVER THOMPSON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN CLARK. >> AYE.

[9.1. Consideration and possible action regarding possible appointments, re-appointments and/or removals to City Boards, Commissions, Task Forces, Economic Development Corporations, Local Government Corporations and Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Boards, City Council Liaisons, and Area Government appointments]

>> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0. >> NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 9 .1 POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING POSSIBLE APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENT AND/OR REMOVALS TO CITY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, TASKFORCES, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS AND TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE BOARDS, CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS AND AREA GOVERNMENT APPOINTMENT.

I KNOW COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK, YOU WERE WORKING ON I THINK CONTACTING ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS?

>> YES, SIR, WE MET AS A NOMINATING COMMITTEE YESTERDAY.

WE HAD THE CITY SECRETARY ANGELO WORK DILIGENTLY TO WORK WITH ALL THE BOARDS AND COMMISSION CHAIRS TO FIND OUT ABOUT REAPPOINTMENTS AND THEN WE WENT THROUGH ALL OF THEM.

WE WILL GO THROUGH EACH ONE AND WE HAVE ALL OF THEM HERE.

WE WILL GO FOR EACH ONE THAT WE BEGET UNCLEAR AND ALSO THE UPDATE BASED ON THE BOOKS TO THE EXCEL SHEET TO BE UPDATED.

>> IF I START WITH AN ITEM. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE MAYOR SNYDER IN COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK FROM THE D.C.

>> WE ALREADY HAD THAT INCLUDED INHERENT.

>> LET US GO THROUGH OUR LIST IN THE ORDER THE NOMINATING

COMMITTEE DID IF WE COULD. >> AND TRY TO BRING SOMETHING

APPEAR. >> OKAY.

>> AND TO ADD COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON AND COUNCIL MEMBER KOLAR. I THINK THIS IS OUTSIDE OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE FOR TALKING ABOUT COUNSEL APPOINTMENT AND

COUNCIL MEMBER. >> I JUST WANT TO SAY WE HAVE A

PROTOCOL. >> OKAY.

I MADE A MOTION. >> OKAY.

IF THERE IS A SECOND WEEK IN DISCUSSION AND THEN MOVE ON.

>> ALRIGHT. >> I WILL SECOND.

YOU GUYS HAD A DIFFERENT PROPOSAL FOR THIS OR SOMETHING

[00:55:04]

ELSE? >> THE PROTOCOLS WE ADOPTED FOR ALL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS FOR PEOPLE TO BE APPOINTED TO A BOARD, HAS TO SUBMIT AN ALLOCATION TO THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE AND WE WILL REVIEW WITH THE CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD WILL MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. SO WE FOLLOW THAT PROCEDURE FOR EVERY BOARD AND COMMISSION INCLUDING THE EDC SO WE NEED TO FOLLOW THE PROCESS THAT WE ADOPTED A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO AND THEN WE CAN VOTE ON THOSE AND IF THAT FAILS AND WE WANT TO DISCUSS SOMETHING DIFFERENT, THAT IS FINE BUT WE SHOULD ALL THE PROTOCOLS THAT WE ADOPTED. THAT IS WHY I SENT OUT THE APPLICATION THAT WE RECEIVED. THE CHAIR INTERVIEWED THE PERSON AND ALSO MADE RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS REDUCED UNDER ONE COUNCIL MEMBER THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE WENT THROUGH THAT AS WELL AND WILL PUT FORWARD THE NAMES OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEES AUTHORITY IS TO DO.

I DON'T KNOW WHY WERE TRAINED TO JUMP AHEAD AND NOT FOLLOW THE

PROTOCOLS. >> IN RESPECT TO THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE. IT IS TO REVIEW APPLICATIONS, THEN IT IS TO RECOMMEND APPOINTMENTS.

DOES IT INCLUDE CONTACTING EVERY BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBER TO SEE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET OFF OR GO OUT AND ASK PEOPLE WE NEED YOU TO GET ON THE BOARD AND IF I CAN GET YOU A SPOT CAN I GET YOU ON THERE. IS THAT PART OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE WHICH IS REVIEWING APPLICATIONS.

>> THE PROCESS IS AND RESET IT PUBLICLY FOR THE LAST THREE WEEKS WE HAVE VACANCIES, WE DIRECTED THE CITY SECRETARY IN PUBLIC AT THE LAST MEETING TO CONTACT THE CHAIRS AND ASK FOR, WE DON'T REQUIRE RENOMINATION TO RESUBMIT AN APPLICATION THEY HAVE TO SEND AN E-MAIL OR VOCALIZE BACK THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR RENOMINATION WE PUBLICLY AND THE LAST TWO WEEKS AGO ASKED ANGELA TO DO THAT AND SHE REACH OUT TO THE BOARD AND COMMISSION PEOPLE SHE THEN GOT ALL THE RESPONSES, PUT IN EXCEL SEND IT TO THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE THEN WE MET AND DISCUSSED AND READY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM WHAT WE RECEIVED FOLLOWING THE PROTOCOLS THAT WE AS A

COUNSEL ADOPTED. >> THE LAST THING ON THE EDC.

I THINK THAT'S DIFFERENT BECAUSE A COUNSEL IS GOING TO DETERMINE HOW MANY COUNCILS SAT ON THE E EDC, NOT THE EDC UNLESS THEY CHANGE THEIR BYLAWS AND WE APPROVE THE BYLAWS.

>> IT SAYS UP TO TWO. >> TO SIMPLE FOR THE COUNCIL DETERMINES. THAT'LL BE A COUNSEL DISCUSSION WHICH I STARTED HOPEFULLY AND ALSO THE APPOINTMENTS OF A COUNCIL MEMBER ON THE EDC SINCE IT'S A UNIQUE BOARD AND WE DON'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY ON OTHER BOARDS I THINK IS ALSO A COUNSEL

DISCUSSION. >> I AGREE.

>> THAT'S WHY I MADE NOT A MOTION ON LIBRARY OR PARKS BUT ON THE ONE BOARD THAT CITY COUNCIL SITS ON AND PARTICIPATES IN IN THE CITY COUNCIL ULTIMATELY TAKES THE PEOPLE.

THE REASON I BEEN ON THERE TWO YEARS AND I THINK YOUR TENURE AS COUNCIL MEMBER AND EDC YOU HAVE BEEN ON THERE TWO YEARS.

WE NEED TO MIX THINGS UP IN MY MIND COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON HAS BEEN ON THERE PREVIOUSLY IS A NUMBER.

COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON IN HIS SHORT TIME HAS IMPRESSED ME WITH THE ENTHUSIASM OF TALKING TO BUSINESS LEADERS IN TALKING TO PEOPLE AND TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT HUTTO CAN DO TO GET DEVELOPMENT HERE AND COUNCIL MEMBER KOLAR IS ONE OF OUR SENIOR PEOPLE IN THE ONLY REASON I DIDN'T PUT MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON WAS BECAUSE WERE ALSO WORKING ON THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AND I DON'T WANT ANYBODY SPREAD OUT TO SIN BUT

THAT'S WHY I MADE THIS MOTION. >> I DON'T DISPUTE THAT.

MY POINT IF COUNCIL MEMBER KOLAR IS NOT HERE AND HAS NOT SUBMITTED ANY INCLINATION THAT THAT'S WHAT SHE WANTS TO SIGN UP FOR ADDITIONAL TWO MEETINGS A MONTH I THINK IS INAPPROPRIATE AND UNFAIR TO SAY THAT THEY'RE NOT HERE AND WOULD WANT TO DO

IT. >> I THINK MAYBE RESPECTFULLY, MAYOR HE MIGHT BE SURPRISED WITH WHAT THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE DOES HAVE TO PUT FORWARD. OBVIOUS THE ANOTHER'S EMOTION IN THAT HAS BEEN SECONDED BUT I THANK YOU MIGHT BE SURPRISED IF YOU ACTUALLY WAIT AND SEE WHAT THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE HAS PUT

TOGETHER TO PRESENT TO COUNSEL. >> WE CAN ALSO DISCUSS YOUR IDEAS FOR THE COMMITTEE'S IDEAS IN TERMS OF AMENDMENT.

IT'S NOT LIKE COMMUNICATION OR DISCUSSION THIS IS MEANT TO ADD.

[01:00:01]

>> I WAS NOT DISPUTING I WAS SAYING WE SHOULD FOLLOW COUNSEL PROTOCOL AND WILL MAKE IT TO THAT WE PUT FORWARD IN IF THEY SAY YOU DON'T WANT TO VOTE ON ONE OF THE GROUP INDIVIDUAL AND WE GO BY EACH PLACE THAT IS FINE I WAS INSANE WITH THE PROCESS WAS. WHAT WE WERE GOING TO SUGGEST AFTER HEARING FEEDBACK FROM THE CHAIR THEY WOULD LIKE IT TO GET DOWN TO A SINGLE COUNCIL MEMBER IF WE WOULD BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN THAT THAT'S WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD HAVE SET INCLUDING THE CHAIR. WE GOT AN APPLICATION IN FROM PARENTS OWENS AND THE CHAIR INTERVIEWED THIS PERSON AND LET THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE GO THAT THEY WOULD ENDORSE AND HAVE THE PERSON ADDED TO THE EDC. I WAS GOING TO PUT FORWARD THE NOMINATION TO REPLACE ME ON PLACE ONE WITH PARENTS OWENS WE WE'RE GOING TO PUT WAIS-III SEAN LUCAS TO GET REAPPOINTED BACK ON THE BOARD. WE WE'RE GOING TO PUT FORWARD BRIAN THOMPSON AS YOU SAID TO REPLACE PLACE FIVE WHICH IS YOU AND RE-NOMINATE MATT ON PLACE SEVEN THAT WAS FOR AND ALSO RECOMMENDED BY THE CHAIR. INTERPROCESS THAT'S WHAT WE WILL PUT FORWARD A MOTION TO VOTE, DISCUSS ENDED UP THAT WOULD BE THE AMENDED TO YOUR MOTION THAT WE DO IT AS A NOMINATING

COMMITTEE PUT FORWARD AS A VOTE. >> TO BE HAVING TO MIMIC?

>> SECOND. >> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK, DO WE

HAVE A SECOND. >> SECOND.

>> COUNSEL NEVER CAN THEY? >> I DO SEE THE APPLICATION AND PARENTS IS A VERY GOOD PUBLIC SERVANT.

THE ONE CONCERN I HAVE THERE IS TO BOARDS AND OUR ENTIRE CITY IN MY MIND THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER BOARD AND THAT IS PLANNING AND ZONING IN THE EDC AND THERE NEEDS TO BE IN MY OPINION SOME SORT OF BUSINESS, OWNERSHIP EXPERIENCE, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL BANKING. WE HAD A PERIOD OF TIME WHEN THE EDC WAS MADE UP OF VERY NICE PEOPLE BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY EXPERIENCE SO NOT A LOT GOT DONE AND A LOT OF PEOPLE'S OPINIONS.

THEN WE STARTED LOOKING AND SOMETIMES YOU GET APPLICATIONS AND BUT IN SOME INSTANCES YOU NEED TO LOOK WHAT ARE WE MISSING ON THE EDC TO MAKE IT BETTER FOR THE COMMERCIAL BANKER AND A PERSON WITH CONSTRUCTION BIDDING EXPERIENCE.

WITH A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSE IN A PERSON THAT RAN THE ENTIRE TDL ARE FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS.

WE HAVE A PERSON CURRENTLY THAT'S DONE A380 AND MOVE THE COMPANY. WE ADDED ANOTHER PERSON.

ANOTHER EXPERIENCE LEVEL. MY FEAR IF WE ARE GOOD PEOPLE PUBLIC SERVICE BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE SKILL SET THEN WERE TALKING MULTIMILLION DOLLAR BUDGETS.

MY CONCERN WE MAY END UP IN A SITUATION WHERE WE GO BACK THE WAY WE CAME FROM BECAUSE NOT THIS YEAR OR NEXT YEAR BUT OVER TIME WE LOSE ALL OF THE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS MAKING IT GO WELL AND WE GO BACK TO KIND OF HOW WE ARE.

I WOULD CAUTION EVERYBODY THAT WE CAN BE FRIENDS AND PEOPLE THAT IF THEY DON'T HAVE THE EXPERIENCE JUST LIKE PLANNING AND ZONING IF YOU PUT SEVEN PEOPLE UP WITH A WANT TO SERVE.

YOU MAY SEE THINGS GET APPROVED IN PEOPLE SPECIAL HEAD SAYING WHY DO WE DO THAT. IT'S BECAUSE THE PEOPLE OF THE, PLANNING AND ZONING HAS CHANGED WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE OF EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD AND LAST THING ICE WILL FEEL LIKE I APPRECIATE THE CONCERN OF THE COUNCIL MOTHERS.

I DON'T MIND NOMINATING ONE AND LEAVING ONE OPEN AND LEAVING COUNCILMAN MCCULLERS ACCEPTANCE BUT WE ARE TALKING THE EC WILL HAVE BUDGETS HIGHER THAN THE CITY OF HUTTO WILL HAVE PREDICTORS CAN BE 60, 70, $80 MILLION TRANSACTION GOING ON ALL BE HONEST I THANK YOU NEED MUCH COUNSEL AND INVOLVEMENT AND WHILE IT FRUSTRATES PEOPLE WE ULTIMATELY HAVE TO PROVE THOSE.

IF THEY ARE DOING THINGS THAT COME BEFORE US AND WE DO NOT APPROVE THEM THAT WILL CREATE MORE FRUSTRATION.

WHILE WE ARE DOING THE DEALS I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT TO HAVE.

I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF MORE THAN TWO BUT I THINK WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE BYLAWS OF THE POINT.

THAT IS MY THOUGHTS ON. >> I'M NOT OPPOSED TO COUNCIL MEMBER KOLAR BUT SHE'S NOT HERE TO TALK WERE SAFE AT THE TIME

COMMITMENT SHE CAN COMMIT TO. >> AND WE HOLD OFF AND APPOINT ONE COUNCIL MEMBER TO FILL THE SPOT AND REVISIT THIS AFTER OUR

JOINT MEETING? >> WHAT WE HAVE ONE MOTIONS FEMA COMMITTEE TO VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT.

>> I DON'T THAT WE NEED TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER THAT IT WOULD BE BASICALLY WAIT UNTIL JULY 6 WHICH IS THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE EDC MEETS AGAIN BEFORE THEN.

[01:05:02]

>> THEY MEET NEXT WEEK. >> HEARING OR THE DISCUSSION.

CALL VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION.

>> MAYOR SNYDER. >> NÉE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK. >> AYE.

>> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. >> AYE.

>> COUNSEL MEMBER THOMPSON. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN KINSEY. >> AYE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON. >> AYE.

>> THE MOTION PASSES BY - 1. >> IS THAT THE AMENDMENT YOU ARE

VOTING ON? >> YES.

>> ARE YOU OKAY IF WE FINISH OUT THIS DEPARTMENT?

>> I THOUGHT I NAMED ALL FOUR ENVIRONMENT.

>> WE APPROVE THE MEMO BUT WE HAVE TO PROVE MOTION.

>> YES IF YOU WILL READ THE NAMES AGAIN WE WILL BE VOTING ON

THESE NAME. >> PLACE ONE PARENTS OWENS.

PLACE THREE SEAN LUCAS. PLACE FIVE BRIAN THOMPSON, PLACE

SEVEN MATT. >> ANY DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS?

>> ONLY DISCUSSION IF THE CHAIR AT SOME POINT HAS ISSUES THEY CAN ALWAYS BRING UP AND WE ALWAYS HAVE THE ABILITY TO REMOVE AND REPLACE AND IF YOU FIND WE NEED ANOTHER COUNCIL MEMBER THAT IS SOMETHING WE CAN DO IN THE FUTURE BUT IS THE CITIZEN LED BOARD SO THE CHAIR MADE A RECOMMENDATION.

I THINK WE SHOULD HONOR. >> I'M ASSUMING THE POLICY OF COUNCIL MEMBER'S ARE WELCOME IN THE MEETING IS STILL IN PLACE I'M NOT AS CONCERNED HOW MANY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON THE RIGHT I THINK WE SAW VISIBILITY WHAT'S GOING ON.

>> ABSOLUTE SMACKING OF THE DISCUSSION?

PREPARING CALLED ABOUT. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> COUNSEL MEMBER THOMPSON.

>> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN CLARK. >> AYE.

>> MAYOR SNYDER. >> NÉE MOTION PASSES BY - 1.

WHAT IS NEXT ON YOUR LIST. >> BUILDINGS AND STANDARDS.

PLACE ONE KURT, PLACE THREE CHERYL STEWART, PLACE FIVE TONY

WERTZ. >> CAN YOU CLARIFY.

>> THESE ARE ALL REAPPOINTMENTS. EVERYTHING IS REAPPOINTMENT.

YOU WANT ME TO LIST THEM OFFER EVERY SINGLE.

>> OF THEIR ALL REAPPOINTMENTS I'M FINE GOING THROUGH THE WHOLE

THING. >> ARE ALL REAPPOINTMENTS.

>> TONY WERTZ DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION CANDACE WALKER PLACE FIVE CORY. ETHICS REVIEW COMMISSION PLACE FERRARI BROWN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PLACE ONE IN NORMAN DELAY, PLACE FOR JUDAS SMITH.

LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE BUT THREE VACANCIES.

PARK ADVISORY BOARD PLACE ONE CHARLOTTE TRIER, PLACE ONE CORY DENTON PLANNING AND ZONING THAT IS GOING TO BE SKIPPED BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT HEARD BACK ON THAT WE WILL TAKE THAT UPON JULY 6.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PLACE ONE IS RAY ALBA.

WE HAD ONE RESIGNATION SO THIS WOULD BE ONE CHANGE FOR PLACE FIVE WE HAD TONY WERTZ AN ALTERNATE.

WE AS A NOMINATING COMMITTEE SAID CAN WE MOVE US PLACE FIVE AND THAT WAY WILL LEAVE A VACANCY FOR AN ALTERNATE IN

PLACE SEVEN NORMAN DELAY. >> WHAT WORD WAS THAT ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT THEY DON'T MEET THAT OFTEN ONCE A YEAR.

THE NEXT ONE IS BORN OVER ONE PLACE ONE MIKE SNYDER, PLACE THREE AMBER LEE KOLAR, PLACE FIVE DON CARLSON BOARD NUMBER TWO, PLACE THREE MARCUS COLEMAN, PLACE FIVE MIKE SNYDER, PLACE 70 IMPORTANT INTO ONE VACANCY ON BOARD NUMBER TWO THAT WE HAVE TO

FILL. >> IS THAT CITY? OR ACCOUNTING APPOINTMENT MATT COUNTY IS EIGHT AND NINE.

BOARD NUMBER THREE, PLACE ONE DAN THORTON, PLACE THREE AMBER LEE KOLAR, PLACE FIVE SEAN LU LUCAS.

>> SECOND. >> IS THAT A MOTION.

>> THAT WAS A MOTION TO APPROVE ALL AND I THINK WE HAVE A

SECOND. >> SOUND TRANSECTED BY COUNCILMAN KINSEY. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?

HEARING ON, PLEASE CALL THE. >> COUNCILMAN KINSEY.

>> AYE MCNAIR SNYDER SCHEMA AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

[01:10:03]

>> AYE. >> MAYOR THOMPSON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

TWO MORE ITEMS AND THEN WE CAN BE DONE IF YOU WILL INDULGE ME FOR A SECOND I WANT TO ANNOUNCE WE HAVE SOME VACANCIES BECAUSE PEOPLE MOVING WERE CHOSE NOT TO BE REAPPOINTED IN ALL OF THOSE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE CITY SECRETARY AND AFTER THE MEETING ALL UPDATE AND SEND IT BACK TO HER IN A BE ON THE WEBSITE POSTED FOR VACANCIES AND THE OTHER PART WE ARE GOING TO HOPEFULLY ENCOURAGE ANYONE IN THE CITIZENS UNIVERSITY THAT THEY WILL ALSO BE GIVEN THE LIST SO AFTER THEY FINISHED THEY WANT TO APPLY. I BELIEVE WILL BE DONE BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING SO GET YOUR APPLICATIONS IN AND I DON'T KNOW FOR JULY WEEKEND IF WE WILL MEET BEFORE THE SIXTH IT'LL PROBABLY BE THE SECOND WEEK IN JULY. THERE IS THAT.

THE LAST THING THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TASK FORCE ACTUALLY SUNSETS JUNE 30 AND BECAUSE WE HAVE EMERGENCY SERVICES DIRECTOR WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE BEFORE I BELIEVE THE TASK FORCE SHOULD GO

AHEAD AND DISSOLVE. >> ALL DISAGREE ON DISSOLVING.

I THANK YOU NEED TO SIT THROUGH MEETING OTHER EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TASK FORCE BEFORE YOU DISSOLVE WE DISSOLVE THE COMMUNICATION TASK FORCE AN HOUR ASKING PEOPLE HOW WE ARE COMMUNICATING. I WOULD GET WITH MR. ZITO GET WITH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION AND FIND OUT EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HIRE A LOT OF EMPLOYEES TO TAKE OVER WITH THE TASK FORCE IS DOING WHICH I DON'T THINK JAMES WILL LIKE ASKING FOR ALL OF THE ORIOLE SEE THE TASK FORCE IS WORKING ON WAYS WHEN THERE IS A DISASTER AND THE THINGS THAT THE BE ABLE TO DO.

BEFORE WE GET ON AROUND TALK TO THEM.

>> WE WON'T DO IT I JUST DON'T WANT TO BRING IT UP.

I WOULD ASK THAT WE HAVE AN AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED WITH THE EMERGENCY DIRECTOR WITH THE AMOUNT AND PROCESS WHAT HE NEEDS AND TO DO THAT AND THIS WILL STAY IN PLACE UNTIL WE GET THE ANSWER PRETTY WILL BE DISSOLVED IT'LL JUST BE IN PLACE.

>> WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION TO RENEW IT.

>> THEY ALL EXPIRE ON JUNE 30. WE DON'T DISSOLVE THE TASK FORCE THEY WOULD JUST STAY IN HOLDOVER POSITION.

>> AT LEAST THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO BRING UP THE QUESTION DO WE DISSOLVE IT OR FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. THAT WILL BE FINE.

THAT IS IT FOR AMERICA IF WE DON'T TAKE ACTION TONIGHT THEY

STILL MEET. >> HAND RADIO TRAINING.

>> IS THAT CORRECT SENSOR MADE BY ORDINANCE AND HAS A DATE, IS

THAT CORRECT? >> THE TASK FORCE SINCE THEY ARE APPOINTED IN THE CONSTITUTION HAS A HOLD OVER PROVISION I BELIEVE THAT WOULD APPLY TO THE TASK FORCE.

>> WORST-CASE IT COULD BE SEVEN RESIDENTS WHO ILLEGALLY MET TO TALK ABOUT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

>> IF IT'S NOT A HOLDOVER AND THEY MEET THERE NOT UNDER CITY ORDINANCE REGULATION SMACK TASK FORCE WE DETERMINE THEY DON'T

HAVE TO FOLLOW OMA. >> RIGHT.

>> A COUPLE SUBCOMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS.

WE HAVE A CONTAINER PARK SUBCOMMITTEE.

I'M ASKING MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON, COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON AND

MYSELF TO MEET ON THAT. >> CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS.

>> IT'S A COMMITTEE TO TALK ABOUT CONTAINER PARKS.

IT'LL BE AFTER WE MEET WHAT WE TALK ABOUT.

A SUBCOMMITTEE, I DON'T KNOW THE BEST WAY TO DO THIS BUT A PROCLAMATION NAMING THE CITIZEN OF THE YEAR COMMITTEE.

COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK, COUNCIL NUMBER THORTON AND COUNCIL MEMBERS SEEM TO BE WELL CAUGHT. I'M JUMPING THE GUN BUT I'M PRETTY CONFIDENT SHE'S GOING TO BE SWORN IN TUESDAY THE IDEA OF THIS WE GET REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION AND I TALKED TO CITY MANAGEMENT WE DON'T HAVE A STANDARD YOU JUST DO IT.

NAMING RIGHTS WEATHERBY BUILDINGS OR STREETS I'VE BEEN ASKED ABOUT STUFF LIKE THAT AND RIGHT NOW I DEFAULTED WE DON'T HAVE A POLICY SO I DON'T THINK WE COULD NAME A BUILDING AFTER SOMEBODY MATTER HOW GREAT THEY ARE WITHOUT A POLICY AND I'VE BEEN ASKED WE DON'T DO ANYTHING FOR CITIZEN OF THE YEAR OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT AND THEY WANT ME TO PICK A RANDOM PERSON AND

[01:15:02]

SO IF YOU WILL BE OKAY WITH THOSE APPOINTMENTS I WILL HEAR FROM COUNCIL ELECT PREVENT ANOTHER PROPER TERM WILL CALL LATER ON ON THAT BUT COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK AND THORTON ARE OKAY WITH. BY DIRECTION OF THEM MANY PROTOCOLS. PROBABLY SAID TO BE X NUMBER OF

SERVICE HOURS. >> YOU GUYS CAN MEET AND BRING SOMETHING UP THAT WOULD BE GREAT.

[10.1. Consideration and possible action with respect to Resolution No. R-2023-128 of the City of Hutto, Texas, Determining costs of the proposed Public Improvements in the Emory Crossing Public Improvement District (Improvement Area #2), approving a proposed Assessment Roll, and making related findings and determinations, in accordance with Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code (Anne LaMere)]

>> FOR THE RECORD AND LINEAR ENTERING FINANCE DIRECTOR I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE OUR BOND COUNSEL.

PART OF VALOR HE WILL PRESENT DESIGN.

>> THANK YOU BART FOWLER MY PLEASURE SERVING AS BOND COUNSEL YOU MAY RECALL SEVERAL YEARS AGO THE PUBLIC AND PERMIT THE ISSUED ONE SERIES OF BONDS OR AREA NUMBER ONE.

THE FIRST ITEM DOES WHAT IT SAYS THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO BE 9.6 MILLION UNDER 9.6 MILLION THE TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT EXPECTED IN THE TIRE WAS 40 MILLION WHEN WE ADD THAT FOR NUMBER ONE THAT IS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT. THE OTHER COMPONENT THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL WILL BE FINALIZED WHEN BONDS ARE ISSUED EXPECTED TO BE JULY 6 AND COME BACK WITH AN ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE ASSESSMENT PLAN AT THE TIME. THE LAST PLANE A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 6 THE PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE OF THAT HEARING TO BE DONE IN THE NEWSPAPER THAT IS PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPERS ATTORNEY NEAR HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT HIS ACTION AND SPECIFIC RESOLUTION BE MET THINK USER.

>> QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION OR ACTION FROM COUNCIL.

>> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THEM, THAT IS THE GROWTH COMING THERE PAYING FOR THEIR OWN DEVELOPMENT, ESSENTIALLY PEOPLE MOVING THERE AND AS LONG AS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID LAST YEAR IN 2022 ARE PAID POLICY FOR THE BONDS WHERE THEY HAVE TO POST THAT THERE IN A PAID DISTRICT AND HOW MUCH AND EVERYTHING WE REALLY TIGHTENED UP AND NO OBSTACLE GEISHA WHAT'S THERE WHEN PEOPLE GO TO BUY PROPERTY.

THAT'S ALL I HAD TO SAY. >> ONE QUESTION.

JUST REMIND ME THIS IS ONE. BUT DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT AREAS THAT THEY ARE TAKING DOWN THE PIT BONDS SEQUENTIALLY ANYONE BUT THE ENTIRE PERIOD IS GOING TO BE EXPECTED THERE NOT TO BE DIFFERENT BASED ON IMPROVEMENT AREA.

>> I MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER THEM THERE DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT FROM THE AREA BUT THE ACTUAL ASSESSMENT RICK ROSENBERG CAN

PROBABLY EXPLAIN BETTER. >> RICK ROSENBERG WITH THE DTS P THE EXPECTATION THAT EACH AREA WILL HAVE THE SAME EQUIVALENT TAX RATE THEY WILL NOT HAVE THE SAME PAYMENTS BECAUSE DIFFERENT

VALUES IN DIFFERENT AREAS. >> I GUESS THAT'S WHAT I WAS

GETTING IT. >> EQUIVALENT TAX RATE PEOPLE IN THE IMPROVEMENT AREA ARE SEPARATE FROM THE PEOPLE IN

IMPROVEMENT AREA ONE. >> IMPROVEMENT AREA ONE AND TWO THEY WILL HAVE THE SAME EQUIVALENT 41 CENTS.

>> THANK YOU. >> OTHER DISCUSSION?

>> JUST A COMMENT FOR AND JAMES, WHEN THE BONDS COME THROUGH WE MADE A PAYMENT FROM THIS COMMUNITY AND AS I MENTIONED BEFORE I WOULD MAKE SURE WE ARE READY THAT WE ISOLATE THAT PAYMENT THAT WE'RE MARKET TOWARDS A TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT IN

[01:20:04]

WHAT WE WANT TO SPEND IT ON. >> THEREFORE IMPROVEMENT AREAS THIS IS IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER TWO WHEN THE PIT BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER ONE WERE ISSUED FOR $500,000.

THESE BONDS WILL GO TO SALE JUL. THE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO THE CITY ON OR BEFORE JULY 20 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT. 500,000.

>> I AM SORRY, 500,000 FOR PHASE THREE AND ANOTHER 500,000 FOR PHASE FOUR. ONCE THE BONDS ARE ISSUED.

>> IS A CLARIFICATION IN THE FUTURE WHEN WE PREPARE THESE IF YOU CAN PUT THAT IN THE FISCAL NOTE SO THE PUBLIC SEES THE BENEFIT OF WHEN WE APPROVE THIS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT GOES TO THE ACTUAL CITIZENS THAT YOU HAVE INCREASED TRAFFIC TAKING IN

THOSE FUNDS. >> A VERY GOOD, I'M SORRY I FORGOT THAT. THANK YOU.

>> COUNSEL THORTON'S POINT THE 500,000 THOSE ARE GOING INTO A SPECIFIC ACCOUNT. IT'S BEING PROTECTED IS AWKWARD GOING TO GENERAL FUND, WE FORGET IT'S THERE AND WE SPEND IT.

>> CORRECT. >> THANK YOU.

>> A GREAT POINT DAN. >> ANYTHING ELSE FOR 10.1?

>> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 2.1 AS PRESENTED.

>> MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE

MOTION? >> HEARING NONE, PLEASE CALL THE

VOTE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN MCKENZIE.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN RETURN.

[Items 10.2 & 10.3]

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

NEXT WE HAVE 10 10 - TO CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE ACTION WITH RESPECT TO RESOLUTION O-2023-130 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS APPROVING THE FORM AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF A PRELIMINARY LIMITED MEMORANDUM FOR CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2234 EMILEE CROSSING PUBLIC AND PERMIT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT AREA

NUMBER TWO. >> ONE, BEFORE I EXPLAIN THIS ITEM 10.3 IS AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBITED TO THE MEMORANDUM I APOLOGIZE HUTTO HAS A PRIME EXAMPLE TO TAKE A 10.2 AND 10.3 EXAMPLE WANT TO READ 10.2 YOU APPROVE THE FORM OF 10.3. IF IT'S OKAY WITH YOUR CITY ATTORNEY I THINK IT MAKES SENSE TO CALL THE TWO ITEMS TOGETHER.

>> YES. >> ALRIGHT.

IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION FROM COUNCIL WE WILL READ 103 AS WELL BEEN A CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE ACTION WITH RESPECT TO RESOLUTION O-2023-0131. APPROVING EMILEE CROSSING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER TWO AUTHORIZING TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT PROVIDING PROPER NOTICE AND AN EFFECTIVE

DATE. >> THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THE RECORD I AM MARK FALLON. THE FIRST ITEM 10.2 IS APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM IS NECESSARY TO MARKET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN TEXAS. IT'S A LENGTHY DOCUMENT.

I WILL COMMEND THE CITY STAFF AND THE DEVELOPERS TEAM.

WE GOT THIS TOGETHER VERY, VERY QUICKLY ON A FAIRLY ACCELERATED SCHEDULE AND IT CAME TOGETHER IN REALLY GOOD SHAPE.

A MUST IN RECORD TIME AND SURPRISE A LOT OF US COULD WERE LUCKY TO GET HERE TO DO THIS. THE DOCUMENT IS SIMILAR TO IMPROVEMENT NUMBER ONE AND SAME DEVELOPMENT AND NEW IMPROVEMENT IN GEOGRAPHIC AREA WITHIN THE DISTRICT AND IT DOES HAVE SEVERAL EXHIBITS TO IT. MOST OF THE AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE NEW ONE IS A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT 10.3. THAT ALLOWS THE DEVELOPMENT TO BE REIMBURSED FROM THE ASSESSMENT PAID FROM THE PIT BONDS WHEN THEY ARE ISSUED IN THE AMOUNT OF THE REIMBURSEMENT MAXIMUM IS 9.95 MILLION I BELIEVE IS THE CORRECT AMOUNT.

THE FORM OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT IS IDENTICAL TO WHAT WE USE FROM NUMBER ONE WE DID NOT WANT TO MAKE CHANGES AT ALL.

NEW CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTE AND THE LEGISLATURE THOSE WERE ADDED OTHER THAN THAT REVISING THE NAME OF THE IMPROVEMENT AREA FROM ONE, TWO AND UPDATING MINOR THINGS. IT IS A FORM THAT YOU SEEN BEFORE AND WERE SUCCESSFULLY ON THE FIRST TRANSACTION.

I'M HAPPY TO EXPLAIN FURTHER BUT THAT LAYS OUT WHAT THE ITEMS ARE IN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

>> I DO HAVE ONE AMENDMENT IT IS ON PAGE 61.

IT HAS TO DO WITH THE LEGACY LITIGATION.

THE GOVERNOR DID SIGN HOSPITAL 1817 ON JUNE 9, 2023 AND WE NEED

[01:25:06]

TO MAKE THAT CORRECTION. >> THAT IS A GOOD POINT, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT SOMETHING COULD CHANGE BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN THIS DOCUMENT IS POSTED NEXT WEEK I'M NOT SURE HOW LIKELY THAT IS BUT IF SOMETHING OCCURS IT REQUIRES US TO MAKE THE CHANGE PAID WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO IT TO YOU ACTION TONIGHT WITHOUT COMING BACK TO COUNSEL.

IF IT'S A MATERIAL CHANGE TO DISCUSS IF WE COME BACK OR NOT IT'S POSSIBLE THE DOCUMENT COULD CHANGE SLIGHTLY FAX CHANGE FOR WE GET OUT TO THE MARKET. I JUST WANTED COUNSEL TO BE AWARE THAT WE WILL UPDATE BECAUSE WE SAID THE GOVERNING STILL HAS NOT SIGNED THAT AND THEN HE DID SIGN ON JUNE 9.

>> WE WILL GET THAT CHANGE MADE BEFORE POSTING.

>> WHAT'S THE CHANGE THAT COULD BE NEXT WEEK THAT HE SIGNS THE BILL OR SOMETHING COMING UP THAT WE MAY OR MAY NOT.

>> THE CITY WILL INTO THAT BETTER THAN I CAN WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING IT VERY CLOSELY AND AS THINGS HAVE CHANGED WE DO VOLUNTARY FILING TO LET THEM KNOW WHAT THE CHANGES BEEN.

I DON'T IF THERE'S A POSSIBILITY BETWEEN NOW AND THEN OR NOT.

>> THE LITIGATION IN THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT AND WE ALREADY DISCLOSED THE STAGE OF WEDDINGTON.

WHEN HE SIGNED THE BILL IT REQUIRES THE LITIGANT LEGACY TO TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WE DID PUT THAT AND IF THE GOVERNOR SIGNS THE BILL THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. THE ONLY THING WE ARE CHANGING WE DID NOT KNOW WHEN WE WERE PREPARING THIS DOCUMENT THAT THE GOVERNOR SIGNED THE BILL. WE'RE JUST GOING TO CHANGE THAT.

>> YOU ARE LOOKING FOR APPROVAL OF 223130 IN 223131 WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT WE UPDATE WITH THE SIGNING OF THE BILL.

>> WHAT PART SAID ABOUT ANY CHANGES THAT WE HAVE TO MAKE BEFORE POSTING. IF THERE SUBSTANTIVE WILL BRING

THEM BACK TO COUNSEL. >> QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR ACTION

FROM COUNSEL. >> ONE THING THAT I NOTICED PAGE 409 OF THE PACKET IT LIST THE CITY COUNCIL WAS PLACED BY BANK IT ISN'T CURRENTLY STILL FILLED BY COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY AND SHE WILL REMAIN UNTIL TUESDAY BUT THEY ARE SAYING IT IS BANK IT

AND IT IS NOT. >> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING AS A QUESTION ON THE CONFERENCE CALL YESTERDAY WHEN THEY PLAN TO POST THIS IS SOMETIMES NEXT WEEK. I GUESS PAST TUESDAY WE MAKE THE

REVISION AS WELL. >> COUNCIL MEMBER WOLCOTT? TWOMAC I DON'T KNOW WHEN WE PLAN TO POST THE DOCUMENT.

MAYBE NEXT WEDNESDAY. >> WE WILL HAVE TO MONITOR THE ANSI AND OFFER MEMORANDUM WERE TALKING ABOUT THINGS I THE CLEAR ERROR THAT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.

IN. WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM 10 .4.

>> 'S OR ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR ACTION?

>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION ARE 2023/130 AND ARE 2023-131 WITH THE AMENDMENTS TO REFLECT THE CHANGE IN STATE LAW OF THE GOVERNOR SIGNATURE TO ALLOW ANY DISCLOSURE UPDATES DUE TO LEGAL UPDATES OF WHEN THE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED AND ANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY IN THE LISTING OF COUNCIL MEMBERS AT THAT TIME AS WELL.

>> SECOND. >> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN REPORT.

I WILL REPEAT EXACTLY YOUR MOTION THAT I GET THE GIST AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE CALL THE VOTE.

>> CONSUMMATE RECORDING DEMAND AYE.

>> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON. >> AYE.

>> NEAR SNYDER. >> COUNCIL NEVER CLARK.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

>> MAYOR, CAN I INTERRUPT FOR A QUICK MOMENT I WAS MESSAGE THAT THERE IS DISCUSSION ON 8.3 BUT THERE WAS NOT A RECORD OF ABOUT.

CAN WE CONFIRM WITH THE CITY SECRETARY IF THERE WAS AN ACTUAL VOTE ON 8.3 OR NOT AND IF NOT IN THE COUNCIL BRING THAT BACKUP.

>> THERE WAS NOT A DISCUSSION ON 8.3.

>> THERE WAS A MOTION MADE LET IT DIE FOR THE SECOND.

[10.4. Consideration and possible action relating to Resolution No. R-2023-133 of the City of Hutto, Texas, accepting a petition and calling for a public hearing on the creation of the Liddell Walker Public Improvement District (PID) within the City of Hutto, Texas (Legal)]

[01:30:02]

>> NO ACTION. >> THANK YOU.

>> THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 10 .4 CONSIDERATION ANO RESOLUTION R-2023-133 OF THE CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS EXCEPTING A PETITION IN CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CREATION OF THE DELL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. WITHIN THE CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS.

>> DOES THIS SAVE ME? >> MAYOR AND COUNCIL, STATE LAW REQUIRES IF THE CITY COUNCIL IS CONSIDERING CREATING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT THEY HAVE TO HAVE A RESOLUTION AND HAVE ALL THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESOLUTION TO CALL THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPT THE POSITION THAT THE DEVELOPER FILED TO CREATE THE DISTRICT. THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPER HAS A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEVE THAT COUNCIL HAS HAD A PRESENTATION ON THIS DEVELOPMENT.

>> IF WE DID IT WAS TWO YEARS AGO.

>> GOOD EVENING RICK ROSENBERG THE PFG CONSULTANT TO THE DEVELOPER. YOU WERE HERE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE PROJECT BUT THIS WILL BE AN UPDATE ON THE OVERALL PROJECT.

THANK YOU. >> THE PROJECT LOCATED EAST OF MUSTANG CREEK COMMUNITY IS 1100 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, FOR LOT TYPES EXPECTED PRICING 380 UP TO 675.

WILL BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE FUTURE BOND ISSUE OBVIOUSLY. THIS IS THE LAND PLAN SHOWING DIFFERENT LOT TYPES IN THE OVERALL COMMUNITY.

VERY HARD TO BE, MY APOLOGIES. WE WANT TO GO THROUGH THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS PER THE CITY. POLICY THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN ANNEXED INTO THE CITY. WE ARE MEETING ALL THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WE ARE ALSO ENHANCING BY CREATING AN EARTHING CHANNEL TO MITIGATE UNCONTROLLABLE SURFACE DRAINAGE. FOR THE RECORD THE DEVELOPER JAMIE DOHERTY IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF MY EXPERTISE. ALSO SIGNIFICANT WORK ON ENHANCING THE ROADWAY NETWORK INCLUDING EASING TRAFFIC AROUND THE SCHOOL. WE LAID IT OUT I'M NOT GOING TO READ ALL OF THEM BUT YOU CAN READ THEM AFTER LEDGER IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THEM ALREADY. SIGNIFICANT ABOVE AND BEYOND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY CODE. WE WILL HAVE 28 ACRES OF PARKS IN EXCESS OF THE 25-ACRE REQUIREMENT AS WELL AS MAKING THE PAYMENT OF $800 PER LOT, THAT IS GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND THE STANDARD. HERE IS A MAP OF THE OPEN SPACE OF THE PROJECT. WE WILL HAVE UPSIZING OF THE LIST STATION AND WE WILL MAKE A CONTRIBUTION TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A FUTURE 24-INCH WATER LINE ALONG MUSTANG CREEK TO PROVIDE MORE CAPACITY FOR THE CITY.

OBVIOUSLY THERE IS A LOT IN THE CITY AND WERE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL WASTEWATER CAPACITY FOR THAT.

HERE IS A LOOK AT THE FUTURE WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR LINE.

COMMUNITY BENEFIT FEE. UNDER THE NEW POLICY THE FEE IS CALCULATED AT 10% PROJECTED GROSS BOND ABOUT IN THE EXACT AMOUNT WILL BE DETERMINED WHEN BONDS ARE ISSUED BASED ON THE EXPECTED BOND AMOUNT THIS WILL BE OVER $4.3 MILLION.

THIS PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW POLICY AND THAT WOULD'VE BEEN $2000 PER LOT ABOUT 2.2 MILLION BUT THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED TO CONTRIBUTE EAST ON THE NEW POLICY.

A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF $2.2 MILLION FOR THE CITY.

FROM AN ECONOMIC STANDPOINT OF BUILDOUT IS EXPECTED TO BEFORE HUNDRED $60 MILLION OF ASSESSED VALUE.

TARGETED MAXIMUM BONDS ARE ALMOST 44 MILLION.

NET BONDS TO THE DEVELOPER AFTER THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT FEE OF SIGHTLY MORE THAN $2 MILLION TARGETING A 30 YEAR TERM I KNOW THERE ARE SOME PID AND THERE WILL BE SOME 30 YEARS WITH THE MAXIMUM EQUIVALENT 72 CENTS A POLICY LIMITATION IS A TOTAL TAX RATE OF THREE-POINT AYE 10. WE EXPECT THREE IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE REFINED AS THE DEVELOPMENT MOVES FORWARD.

RIGHT NOW 400, 40293 LOTS. FROM A TAX STANDPOINT UPON

[01:35:07]

AND WE LAID OUT THE IMPROVEMENT COST NORTH OF $40 MILLION.

OBVIOUSLY DIESEL BE UPDATED AND REFINED AS WE MOVE FORWARD AS WELL. WITH THAT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND I LOOK FORWARD TO THE CHANCE TO DISCUSS THE

PROJECT. >> THANK YOU, QUESTIONS FROM

COUNCIL. >> ON THE 28 ACRES, OPEN SPACE.

HOW MUCH IS FLOODPLAIN VERSUS NOT FLOODPLAIN.

>> THERE IS NO FEMA FLOODPLAIN. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.

>> THE QUESTION THAT IS NOT MY BUSINESS BUT I WILL ASK, WHY NOT DO 35 YEARS INSTEAD OF 30 IF YOU CAN LOWER THE TAX RATE BECAUSE LESS PEOPLE WILL PAY AND I KNOW IT SEEMS LIKE 35 IS A LONGTIME BUT MOST PEOPLE WILL BE IN THE HOUSE IN MY MIND FROM THE TIME OF PURCHASE TO SELL SO WERE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO KNOW THAT THEY'RE STARTING FIVE YEARS OR 30.

>> WERE OPEN FOR THE DISCUSSION. 35 YEARS LIKELY TO HIRE

INTEREST-FREE. >> I WOULD REFER TO YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR. WERE HAPPY TO DISCUSS THE.

>> OUT OF QUESTION LESS TAXES TO PEOPLE IS MORE MONEY THEY CAN SPEND IF YOU CAN SO HOUSES AND MAKE SENSE.

>> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ACTION FOR THIS? I'M TRYING TO LOOK AT THE NUMBER.

>> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION R-2023-133 AS PRESENTED IN TO ACCEPT THE PETITION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC

HEARING. >> A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER

CLARK, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON, ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? HEARING ON, PLEASE CALL THE BOOK.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> AYE. >> COUNCILMAN CLARK.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.

[10.5. Consideration and possible action relating to Resolution No. R-2023-137 of the City Council of the City of Hutto, Texas, electing to be eligible to participate in tax abatement, providing proper notice of meeting and effective date (Legal)]

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES THE - 0.

>> SEE YOU SOON. >> NEXIUM 105 CONSIDERATION OF ACTION RELATING TO RESOLUTION R-2023-133 OF THE CITY OF ACCOUNTS OF THE CITY HUTTO TEXAS ELECTING TO BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN TAX ABATEMENT PROVIDING PROPER NOTICE OF MEETING AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL ECONOMIC GOVERNMENT DIRECTOR. HELP ME FOR ONE SECOND, 10.5 AND 11.1 OBVIOUSLY WE ARE IN A PROCESS NOW TEEING UP IN ABATEMENT DISCUSSION IN A FORMAL SENSE, REMIND ME THE DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN THE TWO. >> WE RESEARCHED THE ORDINANCE CREATING THE TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES AND WE LOOKED AT THE TAX CODE BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN DO IN ORDER TO FINALIZE THE CREATION AND THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT AND TO ENTER INTO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS AND WE CANNOT FIND ONE THAT WENT WITH THE TAX GUIDELINES. THEY WERE CREATED BY ORDINANCE.

THIS IS A RESOLUTION SINCE WE COMPLY WITH STATE LAW BEFORE WE ENTER INTO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS.

>> OKAY. >> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE

RESOLUTION R-2023-137. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK. IMPROVING R-2023-137 IS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE

MOTION? >> HEARING NONE, PLEASE CALL THE

VOTE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK.

[01:40:02]

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 60 MAXI

REPRESENTATIVE. >> ITEM 11.1, ARE WE READING THE WHOLE THING? THERE IS GOING TO BE ONE ERROR NUMBER FOUR I THINK THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE 10 BILLION,

RIGHT? >> ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENT

$10 MILLION. >> THAT'S WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT. >> THERE ARE TWO TRIGGERS ONE IS INITIAL CONSTRUCTION INVESTMENT, THAT IS 10 MILLION HOWEVER, OBVIOUSLY THE PROJECT ITSELF IS LIKELY TO REACH WELL ABOVE THAT TO AS MUCH AS 6 BILLION, 7 BILLION.

>> THAT IS BECAUSE HIS PERSONAL PROPERTY VERSUS AN IMPROVEMENT

[11.1. City of Hutto, Texas Public Notice of a meeting at which the City Council of Hutto, Texas will consider the approval of a tax abatement agreement with Hutto Data Center Campus LLC, a joint venture between affiliates of Dallas-based Skybox Datacenters, LLC and San Francisco-based Prologis, Inc.]

NUMBER IS ACCURATE? >> ITEM 11.1, THE CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS PUBLIC NOTICE OF A MEETING AT WHICH THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTTO TEXAS WILL CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WITH HUTTO DATACENTER CAMPUS LLC, A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN AFFILIATES OF DALLAS-BASED SKYBOX DATA CENTERS, LLC AND SAN FRANCISCO-BASED PRO LODGES INC.

PURSUANT TO THE SECTION 3 12.207 OF THE TEXAS TAX CODE, THE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTTO TEXAS WILL CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AT THE CITY COUNCIL. TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT INFORMATION REQUIRED BY TEXAS TAX CODE SECTION 3 12.TWO 07.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 312.2 07 OF THE TEXAS TAX CODE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED REGARDING THE PROPOSED TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT FOR HUTTO DATACENTER CAMPUS LLC AND JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN THE AFFILIATE OF DALLAS-BASED SKYBOX DATACENTER LLC AND SAN FRANCISCO PRO LODGES INC.

NUMBER ONE, NEIGHBOR PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT FOR TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT. HUTTO DATACENTER CAMPUS LLC CARE OF PROLOGIS INC., 2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE, SUITE 10250 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201. NUMBER TWO, NAME A LOCATION OF REINVESTMENT ZONE IN WHICH THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE AGREEMENT IS LOCATED. HUTTO TAX ABATEMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER ONE AND EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HUTTO TEXAS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3399 COUNTY ROAD 132 HUTTO TEXAS 78634, WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS.

NUMBER THREE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENT.

CONSTRUCTION OF A DATACENTER FACILITY THAT HOUSES IT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BUILDING, RUNNING AND DELIVERING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES IN RESTORING AND MANAGING THE DATA ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES INCOMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD CONNECTED THE PROPERTY TO SR 132. NUMBER FOUR ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENT $10 MILLION. TIME AND PLACE OF THE MEETING.

THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED DURING THE CITY COUNCIL REGULARLY RESCHEDULED MEETING TO START AT 7:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 2023. IN CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 500 WEST LIVE OAK HUTTO TEXAS 78634.

THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE ALSO WILL APPEAR ON THE AGENDA THAT IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT FOR THE SCHEDULED JULY 20, 2023 MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HUTTO TEXAS. THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE. THERE IS NO ACTION WE ARE JUST

PUBLICLY SAYING SOMETHING. >> MAYOR AND COUNCIL YOU NEED TO TAKE SOME ACTION AND I WANT TO NOTE A TYPO I BELIEVE SR 123 SHOULD BE CR AND WHAT YOU'RE DOING THIS DIRECTING THIS NOTICE BE PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER AND ALSO THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT THAT HAS BEEN CONSIDERED ALL BY THE HUTTO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BY THE HUTTO DATACENTER CAMPUS. THEY HAVE REQUESTED TO CHANGES WHICH COUNCIL WAS GIVEN A COPY OF THE TWO CHANGES.

ONE OF THE CHANGES. >> I BELIEVE ONE OF THEM WAS TO REORDER THE INFORMATION AND APPLICATION SO THAT WE MOVED UP THE DESCRIPTION OF THE BENEFITS OF THE COMMUNITY, KIND OF AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS IN THE INFORMATION IN THE APPLICATION

[01:45:02]

IS FARTHER DOWN IN APPLICATION. >> I REMEMBER THAT MOTION THE SECOND REV OF THE APPLICATION WOULD HAVE THOSE CHANGES THAT WE APPROVED AS PRESENTED AS TO EVERYTHING.

>> IS THE SAME CONTENT ULTIMATELY THE ORDER.

>> YOU RECEIVED A MEMO WITH THE REQUESTED CHANGES.

WE HAVE A DEFINITION OF FORCE THE JUROR IN THE FINAL SENTENCE INDICATES. IF WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND USING THE WORDS REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND COMMERCIALLY USABLE MEASURES. THEY REQUEST IS TO CAUSE LITIGATION OF WHAT THE CITY MAY THINK IT WAS AND LOOK TO OTHER PARAGRAPHS THAT HADN'T BEEN IN IT, THAT IS WHEN CHANGE THAT WE ARE ASKING WHERE THE APPLICANT IS ASKING THE COUNCIL TO MAKE.

2.3 THE WORD AGREEMENT WAS LEFT OFF.

ON THE TRANSFERABILITY THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO ASSIGN IT AND THEN NOTIFY THE CITY OF THE ASSIGNMENT TO THEIR AFFILIATES AND THEIR PARTY AND TRANSFER PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY.

>> THAT WAS THE REASON FOR REQUESTING THAT MIGHT OCCUR IN THE EVENT ONE OF THEIR BUYING OUT A PIECE OF THE BUILDING AND BECOME AN OWNER THEY WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY WITH OUR APPROVAL.

THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE GOING TO END UP SHOULD SOMETHING HAPPEN WE ARE GOING TO END UP THAT'S WHY DIDN'T LIKE THE PREVIOUS AGREEMENT ANYTIME THERE IS A GRAY AREA THAT GIVES US ONE THING AND ANOTHER AND SOMEONE TO DO THAT IF YOU KNEW A HURRICANE WAS COMING SOMEHOW YOU WOULD STOCK UP ON CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL WHEN THE HURRICANE BLEW THROUGH TEXAS YOU WOULD CONTINUE TO TEXAS AS NORMAL AND NOT BE DELAYED BY THE HURRICANE. TO ME TAKING IT OUT OF THE AND IT'S ALREADY HARD TO DESCRIBE EVENT.

>> YOU GUYS HIT A NOTICE AND YOU NEED US TO DIRECT STAFF THE NOTICE BE PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER REGARDING THIS AND THE TAX ABATEMENT AND THEN CHANGES THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT.

>> CORRECT. >> ALSO THERE IS A NOTICE TO THE TAXING ENTITY UNDER STATE LAW AND STAFF WILL BE DOING THAT.

IN ADDITION TO THESE NOTICES I'VE SPOKEN WITH MATT AND ON THE WEBSITE WHERE WE HAVE PUBLIC NOTICES THEY ARE GOING TO ADD NOTICE OF TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT AND PUT THE NOTICE IN THEIR TO THE PUBLIC AND LOOK AT THE NOTICE ON THE WEBSITE AND ALSO THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT IF YOU CHOOSE TO APPROVE TONIGHT THAT WILL BE A CLICK AND THEY CAN LOOK AT THAT ON THE WEBSITE.

THIS IS THE FIRST ONE THAT WE CREATED IN THE STAFF FEELS LIKE THEY WANT TO HAVE THE TRANSPARENCY FOR THE PUBLIC.

>> I LIKE IT IT'S NICE TO TELL THE PUBLIC THAT IS GOING TO CHANGE THE CITY AND THE TAX BENEFITS ONLY GIVEN 50% IN THE TAX BENEFITS ARE GOING TO BE ENORMOUS IT'S A LOT BETTER THAN DOING A GREAT DEAL AND NOT TELLING ANYBODY ABOUT IT DOES ANYBODY WANT TO TAKE A STAB NOTICE OF NEWSPAPER AND CHANGES TO THE TAX ABATEMENT HAS BEEN PRESENTED OR ACCEPTED IN THE

TAXING ENTITIES. >> I WILL MAKE THAT MOTION.

>> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN THOMPSON, IS THAT A SECOND MY

CAR? >> THORTON.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?

>> HEARING NONE PLEASE CALL ABOUT.

>> COUNCILMAN RECORD. >> AYE.

>> MAYOR SNYDER. >> AYE SPIVAK MAYOR PRO TEM

GORDON. >> AYE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBERS. >> AYE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY. >> AYE.

[12. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS]

>> COUNCILMAN REPORT. >> AYE.

>> MOTION PASSES 60 MEG 0. NEXT WE HAVE CONSENT AGENDA FOR

[01:50:02]

12.4, 12.5, 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, 12.9.

ANYBODY WANT ANY PULLED. >> MAYOR I APPROVE ALL ITEMS AS

PRESENTED. >> I WILL SECOND KNOCK.

>> MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON SECOND MY COUNSEL MEMBER THOMPSON. SINCE WE ARE NOT BEING PRESENTED WITH FINANCIAL STUFF I WILL BRING UP A COUPLE THINGS AS I ALWAYS LIKE TO SLOW US DOWN AND DO.

PARKS INTERACT I HAVE A QUESTION IF YOU CAN LET THE COUNCIL NO THERE IS A CHANGE WITH MONEY COMING OUT OF MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT GOING TO PARKS IMPROVEMENT AND STRUCTURES I WONDER WHAT MACHINES WERE NOT BUYING AND WHAT STRUCTURES WERE GOING TO BUILD NOW. THE REASON THAT, I WILL LAST BUDGET IT SEEMS LIKE THE LAST THREE YEARS THERE'S ALWAYS EQUIPMENT FEDERAL TO BE BOUGHT NOT BY THE PARKS IN GENERAL, SCHEDULED TO BE BOUGHT AND NOT PURCHASED AND SOMETHING ELSE IS PURCHASED INSTEAD SO I KNOW THE BUDGET IS WOULD BE MORE DETAILED BUT JUST WE KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON THERE.

TO THE PUBLIC NOTICE ARE UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE WE ARGUE HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE IS A CITY.

WE SAY THE UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE IS 14.9 MILLION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR LESS THAN 4.820 MILLION% RESERVES, LESS THE $6 MILLION LOAN TO THE EDC WHICH LEFT 4.1 MILLION IN OUR BEST ESTIMATE ON THE ISSUE THE WAY IT IS GOING WE WILL SEE ADDITIONAL 4 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL MONEY ADDED TO THE RESERVE BASED ON REVENUES EXCEEDING EXPENDITURES WE SHOULD PROVIDE 8.1 MILLION ENDING AND RESERVE BALANCE.

I THOUGHT THAT WAS EXCITING WE ARE STILL MAKING MONEY.

WATER IMPACT FEES ETHICALLY HAVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE BUDGET SOMETHING ABATED, EARLIER TO MILLION WATER IMPACT COLLECTED BY .4 AND WERE HALFWAY THROUGH THE YEAR AND WERE PRETTY MUCH AT THE WASTEWATER IMPACT THE BUDGET OF 3 MILLION IN ROUTE 2.7.

THAT SHOULD HELP WITH $250 MILLION IN PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE COMING. I NOTICED A HOTEL TAX FUND WE BUDGETED $200,000 AND WE'VE ALREADY TAKEN 160,000.

THAT'LL BE IMPORTANT TO KNOW BECAUSE EDC HAD BEEN ASKED TO MAKE A PAYMENT TO THE CITY FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN THE EDC VOTED TO INCENTIVIZE THE THIRD HOTEL AND USE THE MONEY THAT WE WERE TO PAY THE CITY FOR SERVICES AS AN INCENTIVE SO THAT COULD BECOME TO THE COUNCIL FOR THE NEXT MEETING.

ALMOST ON 79.76% OF OUR BUDGET ON SALES TAX.

WE HAVE FORMANTS TO GO LOOKS LIKE WE ARE GOING TO CRUSH IT POTENTIALLY BE CLOSE TO 10 MILLION, MARCH WAS UP 25.8% YEAR-OVER-YEAR. WE USED TO SAY IT WAS ALL INFLATION BASED BUT ISAAC WITH INFLATION DROPPING 26% UP IN MIGHTY ACCOMMODATION OF INFLATION AND PEOPLE MOVING HERE IN A BUNCH MORE RETAIL. I THINK THAT'S IT HIGHLIGHT FOR FINANCIALS THAT SHOULD BE GREAT FOR THE BUDGET YEAR.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR COMMENTS FOR THE CONSENT.

HEARING NONE, PLEASE CALL THE VOTE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER GORDON. >> AYE.

>> CLARK. >> AYE.

>> COUNCILMAN THOMPSON. >> AYE.

>> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY. >> AYE.

>> MAYOR SNYDER. >> AYE.

>> MOTION PASSES 60 MEG 0. I'M NOT SURE WHAT TIME YOU GUYS

[13. EXECUTIVE SESSION]

NEXT WE HAVE EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM 13 .1 LEGAL ADVICE TO SECTION 151071 CONSULTATION WITH THE ATTORNEY TO PENDING LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE PRUITT PROPERTY INVEIGLING PROJECT.

ITEM 13 .2 RECEIVE LEGAL ADVICE PURSUANT TEXAS CODE GOVERNMENT SECTION 551.07 ONE CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY RELATED TO ABOUT THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH COTTONWOOD LOCAL GOVERNMENT

[01:55:02]

133 WILL RECEIVE LEGAL ADVICE TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY RELATED TO PENDING LEGAL REQUEST POTENTIAL CLAIMS PENDING LITIGATION POTENTIAL LITIGATION AND CITY COUNCIL LEGAL REQUEST. THAT IS IT.

[14. ACTION RELATIVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION]

>> 10:18 P.M. BACK FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION.

NO ACTION WAS TAKEN. WE HAVE ITEM 14.1 CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS.

>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL I WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO RESOLVE THE CITY OF HUTTO VERSUS THE PRUITT CONDEMNATION ACTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT NOT TO EXCEED $180,683 USING THE SETTLEMENT FORM APPROVED BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY. >> SO MOVED.

>> MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON, DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK.

ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? HEARING NONE PLEASE CALL THE

VOTE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR SNYDER.

>> AYE. >> MAYOR PRO TEM GORDON.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK.

>> AYE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER THORTON.

>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES 6 - 0.

THERE IS NO OTHER ITEMS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION.

WE WILL MOVE ON TO 13.3 THE WE PULLED OUT THAT IS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ESLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPER PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AS THE CHAPTER FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND HUTTO ECONOMIC INCORPORATION TYPE BE AUTHORIZED IN A CORPORATION TO EXPAND FUNDS WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT. IS ANY DISCUSSION WE WANT TO

HAVE ON THAT? >> GOOD EVENING COUNCIL ASSISTANT VECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

I WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THERE IS STILL AN OPTION ON THE TABLE. I KNOW YOU DID NOT APPROVE THE AGREEMENT, THE EDC DID NOT APPROVE THE AGREEMENT OR RATIFY THAT AT THEIR MEETING ON MONDAY HOWEVER, THEY DID APPROVE AN AGREEMENT ON MAY 8 WHICH YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO APPROVE IF YOU SO CHOOSE PRETTY COUPLE OF UPDATES JUST TO BE AWARE OF REGARDING THAT THEY DIFFER FROM THE AGREEMENT THAT YOU APPROVED ON THE FIRST. THOSE CHANGES INCLUDE, THE FINISH IS A MATERIAL IN SECTION K ON THE FIRST IS INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENT AS WELL. HOWEVER, THE CHANGES REQUESTED BY CITY COUNCIL BETWEEN THE MATES APPROVAL FROM THE EDC AND SIX/ONE APPROVAL FROM COUNCIL WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THOSE CHANGES INVOLVE THE RESTRICTED USES OF NAIL SALON IN GENERAL DENTISTRY. ADDITIONALLY THERE WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED THE RESTRICTION OF THAT YOU APPROVED ON THE FIRST.

AS CALCULATED WE PROJECT THE PROJECT WOULD ONLY PRODUCE 1.2 APPROVED ON THE FIRST. HOWEVER, THE AGREEMENT APPROVED ON THE EIGHTH BY THE EDC ALLOWS FOR MAXIMUM OF 1.5 FOR THE 10 YEAR TERM. THOSE OF THE CHANGES AND UPDATES YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF PRIOR TO VOTING.

>> THANK YOU. >> MAYOR AND COUNCIL I DON'T

[02:00:05]

>> OKAY. >> I WANT TO DISCUSS WITH THE COUNCIL. I'M NOT AGAINST HELPING SOMEBODY OUT. BUT I THINK IF WE TAKE A MOTION TO DECIDE AND I WAS TALKING ABOUT COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK WITH US ABOUT ON MONDAY. WE GET SPECIFICS IN THEIR LIVE EXHIBITS IN TERMS OF WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE LIKE YOU WOULD SEE IN A POD SINCE THAT'S WHAT WE ARE PAYING FOR IF WE ARE PAYING FOR A LOOK THEN OUTLOOK SHOULD BE PART OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE WAYS YOU CAN GUARANTEE THAT YOU GET TO LOOK PRETTY FOR PUT THINGS LIKE THAT IN I THINK THAT CHANGES A LOT OF THINGS BECAUSE THE VAGUENESS IS GONE AND THERE ARE SOME OTHER CHANGES. GEORGE SAID SCRIBNER'S HEIRS I DON'T KNOW IF I AGREE WITH THAT NECESSARILY THAT HE IS THE ATTORNEY PRETTY THINK IF WE DO THAT THE PROTECTION FOR THE CITY. I THINK WHAT WE DON'T WANT WE CAN ALL AGREE WE DON'T WANT TO LOOK BACK IN THREE YEARS THIS DOES NOT EXPIRE IT IS EFFECTIVE UPON A WHOLE BUNCH OF STUFF HAPPENING, THERE IS AN AGREEMENT OUT THERE AND I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE WE DO WANT PEOPLE SAY WHEN IS IT COMING TO WANT TO TRIGGER THE QUEEN MADE EVERYBODY ELSE HAVE AND THAT'S ALL HE ASKED YOU GUYS BRING IT BACK TO PLEASE PUT IN THE SAME THING OF THE DATA CENTER THEY DESCRIBE THE DEFINITION OF DATA CENTER IS IN AN AGREEMENT IN THE DEFINITION OF RESTAURANT IS NOT.

WERE TREATING THE 20 MILLION GUY ONE WAY AND WE SHOULD BECAUSE THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY AND WE SHOULD TREAT EVERYBODY THE EXACT SAME WAY BECAUSE WERE ALL WORKING FOR THE SAME PERSON.

IF WE DO THAT I WOULD PROBABLY STILL VOTE NO BECAUSE IF IT'S BEYOND THAT MUCH MONEY I DON'T LIKE GIVING MORE THAN 50%.

BUT I WOULD NOT HAVE A LOT OF ARGUMENT ANYTHING OTHER THAN A FINANCIAL BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T WORRY ABOUT GETTING SUED OR ALL THE OTHER BAD THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN.

IT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT MONDAY.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE ALWAYS BEEN ON THIS SINCE IT'S THE FIRST DAY IT'S BEEN FINANCIALS AND DETAILS THAT SALLY ASKED FUTURE AGREEMENTS AND I HOPE THE JOINT MEETING WILL COME TO RESOLUTION THAT WE WANT DETAILS BECAUSE THERE IS A PHRASE STRONG CONTRACTS MAKE STRONG FRIENDS. NOBODY HAS HURT FEELINGS IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU MEET THE CRITERIA AND IF YOU DO THE SEAMS THAT WE DID NOT QUITE THERE. I ACTUALLY HAD ASKED DOTTIE TO HAVE THIS ON HERE BEFORE MONDAY EDC.

>> MY OBJECTION TO THE AGREEMENT THAT THE EDC PAST I WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF GIVING 100% AWAY OF THE SALES TAX FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS OF THE AGREEMENT DID. THAT WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE AGREEMENT THAT WAS PASSED BY COUNCIL.

TERMS CHANGE ANOTHER THINGS CHANGED BECAUSE THE ALLOCATION OF THE SALES TAX AS DESCRIBED IN EDC DOES NOT MATCH REALITY BECAUSE IT DOESN'T GET SALES TAX.

I DON'T THINK THAT AGREEMENT CAN BE REVIVED WHEN TICKETS GET A CHANGE OF MATERIAL WAYS NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS I SAKE MOVE FORWARD AND TRY TO FIND A PATH TO SOMETHING THAT IS AGREEABLE

TO THE EDC IN CITY COUNCIL. >> I HEAR WHAT BOTH OF YOU ARE SAYING. MY ONE THOUGHT, I AGREE THERE.

I AGREE I THINK WE AND I BELIEVE COUNCIL HAD MADE UP A MUCH BETTER AGREEMENT THAT WE SENT BACK TO THE EDC AND I WOULD NOT WANT TO PASS THIS TO PROVABLY BUT I THINK SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE SOUGHT AS A COUNCIL WHEN YOU HAVE A BOARD THEY BROUGHT AN AGREEMENT TO US IN THE WAY HIS POLITICAL CAPITAL AND SAID THESE ADDITIONAL THINGS WE DON'T WANT TO NAIL SALON AND WE REDUCE THE AMOUNT WE DID ALL THESE THINGS AND SIGNED IT AS A COUNCIL, THE DEVELOPER SIGNED IT WE SENT BACK THE EDC A BETTER DEAL IN THAT BOARD DID NOT APPROVE IT.

THAT IS A PROBLEM I THINK THAT IS A PROBLEM.

IT CAME FROM THE EDC AND THE PRESIDENT AND THE FUTURE I'M NOT SAYING WE DO IT FOR THIS ONE BECAUSE I WOULD NOT APPROVE AN

[02:05:01]

PASS IT. >> I THINK THE PEOPLE IN THE MEETING WERE DIFFERENT. WERE THE SAME BOARD MEMBERS THERE FOR BOTH MEETINGS. YOU ASKED A QUESTION LET ME ANSWER. IF YOU LOOKED AT THE WHOLE HISTORY FOR BOARD MEMBERS PASSED IN FEBRUARY AT A 4 MILLION-DOLLAR EVALUATION THE MAYOR AND I WERE NOT THERE WE DID NOT VOTE ON THE FIRST AGREEMENT COUNCIL REFUSED TO TAKE IT WE WENT BACK TO THE EDC THEY WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER AND CAME OUT WITH A BETTER DEAL THAT PASSED MAY 8, 2 BOARD MEMBERS

WERE NOT THERE. >> WHAT WAS THE VOTE ON THAT

ONE. >> THREE - 2 IN THE TWO BOARDMEMBER'S THAT PASS THE HIGHER ONE IN FEBRUARY WEREN'T THERE SO TO SAY THAT IT WOULDN'T OF PAST 5 - 2, THEY WERE THERE, THEY WERE THERE AT 4 MILLION THEN 3 MILLION COUNCIL CAME ABACK AND GOT IT TO 27 AND SEND IT BACK THAT'S REGARDLESS OF HOW IT IS AND PEOPLE THINK I'M FIGHTING IT.

I'M NOT I'M JUST SAYING THAT'S A HUGE AGON DEVELOPMENT IS ABOUT EXAMPLE OF HOW WE SHOULD DO AND BE AS A PROCESS OF THE EDC IN THE CITY AND TRYING TO GET DEVELOPERS AND DEALS WHETHER IT'S THE STEEL OR WHATEVER HAPPEN BUT THAT IS A PROBLEM I'M HOPING THAT SOMETHING WE ADDRESS WE HAVE A JOINT MEETING IN JULY.

>> THAT'S A BIG PART OF THE REASON WHY I REQUESTED SO WE CAN GET CLOSER TO BEING ON THE SAME PAGE WHEN YOU HAVE DIFFERENT PEOPLE YOU GET DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS AND PEOPLE CHANGE THEIR MINDS WHEN YOU HAVE A DEAL THAT HAS TO GO THROUGH MULTIPLE ITERATIONS OVER TIME. ANY BOARDMEMBER IN ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL CAN CHOOSE TO CHANGE THEIR MIND BASED ON CONTINUING TO LOOK AT THE FACTS THAT'S WAS HAPPENS THESE THINGS CAN CHANGE AND WHAT A BEAUTY POSITION OF TELLING THE BOARD IF YOU VOTED FOR ONCE YOU BETTER VOTE FOR IT WILL MODIFY AND SEND BACK THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT WORKS THEY HAVE TO GO EACH TIME THEY GET IT RONT OF THEM AND EVERYTHING THAT THEY KNOW AT THAT TIME AND THAT IS WHAT THEY DID.

THAT'S THE WAY IT IS. >> SOMETHING TELLS ME THE VOTE WOULD'VE BEEN DIFFERENT WHEN IT WAS 4 - 0 I ASKED THEM IF THEY READ THE AGREEMENT AND THEY SAID NO.

WE'VE GOT TO READ THE AGREEMENTS AND YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON BECAUSE THE DEFENSE IN COURT THAT I DIDN'T READ IT OR UNDERSTAND IT. AS PART OF HER PROBLEM AS PEOPLE STARTED READING IT THEY STARTED TO NEVER QUESTION, HERE AND THERE AND THE QUESTION STARTED TO CON UP.

THIS AGREEMENT OTHER AGREEMENTS WITH THE MAKE SURE WE READ AND UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AND WE HAVE TO ASK YOURSELVES WHAT IS IT THAT WERE TRYING TO DO IS IT WORTH THE MONEY BEING SPENT ON WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO USING THAT MONEY ON OTHER THINGS AND WERE NOT MISSING ANYTHING RIGHT NOW.

WERE NOT OUT BECAUSE WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WE ARE GOING TO GET WE DID NOT LOSE TARGET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

I SAID MONDAY NIGHT THIS WILL BE THE THIRD AGREEMENT AND AROUND AND WE GAVE EVERYTHING BACK AND AT SOME POINT FORGET TO DIVERSIFY AND SPREAD THE TAX BURDEN OUT SOMETHING WE DO HAS GOTTA MAKE MONEY OTHERWISE IN FIVE YEARS THE NEW COUNCIL WILL BE CRITICIZING US FOR MAKING BAD DEALS THAT DON'T PAY MONEY BECAUSE JAMES MAY BE STRAPPED AND I ASKED JAMES ON THE DEALS WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF OUR TAXES WE DON'T KNOW YET BECAUSE SOME DEALS ARE SO BIG AND SO CHANGING THAT NO CITY IN TEXAS HAS HAD A 5 BILLION EVALUATION AND IN THREE YEARS DOUBLED WITH ONE GUY. NO CITY HAS HAD A DEAL WITH 2 MILLION YOU GIVE AWAY ALL UNCHARTED I SAY WE BE CAREFUL EMBEDDED OUT BECAUSE ONCE YOU SIGN IT AND IT'S GOOD AND YOU TOLD US ABOUT A DEAL WHERE IT DID NOT GO THE WAY EVERYBODY THOUGHT IT WAS. YOU DON'T WANT TO BE THE GROUP WILL DRUG IS OUTSIDE AND BEAT US BECAUSE WE PROMISED GREAT

[02:10:01]

I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK THEY WILL COME BACK NEXT WEEK BUT IF THERE'S MONEY TO BE MADE PEOPLE WILL COME BACK AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THIS COUNCIL NOT TAKEN OF THE DRIVE THROUGH BECAUSE I THINK THAT SHOWS THERE'S THINGS WERE LOOKING FOR IN THE MAYOR PRO TEM BROUGHT IT UP SO WE CAN VOTE FOR.

ANYWAY I CAN GET AS OF 1115, I'M TRYING.

ANYTHING ELSE ON THIS ONE. >> I HOPE STAFF CONTINUES TO WORK ON IT AND BRINGS IT BACK I THINK IT'S WORTHY OF DOING AND WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO TO GET TO A MEETING OF THE MINDS BETWEEN US AND EDC AND WERE COMFORTABLE AND NEED TO MOVE FORWARD AND IF WE MODIFY IT WE MODIFY AND CONTINUES WORK, THAT'S WHAT I

[15. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS]

WANT. >> GENERAL COMMENTS FROM CITY

COUNCIL TO. >> I JUST WANT TO SAY I KNOW WE SAID GOODBYE TO COUNCILWOMAN KRYSTAL KINSEY FOR ALL OF HER SERVICE AND EXTRA HOURS AND EVERYTHING AT THIS FOLDER POSITION IN THE RUNOFF AND EVERYTHING.

THIS LITERALLY IS HER LAST MEETING.

I WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE AND IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE. THANK YOU, EVERYONE ENJOY THE FOURTH OF JULY I HOPE TO SEE YOU AT THE FIREWORKS AT EMERGING PARK. IT WOULD BE GREAT IN THIS WEEKEND JUNE 15 CELEBRATION IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO GET OUT AND BE TOGETHER AND GROW CLOSER TOGETHER AND GET TO KNOW PEOPLE AND CELEBRATE FREEDOM WHICH IS JUNE 19.

THAT IS IT. >> TO COUNCIL MEMBER KINSEY, I WILL SAY ONE THING I THINK I PICKED UP FROM YOU IS A HEALTHY SKEPTICISM OF HIS IN A BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY.

HOPEFULLY WE CAN CONTINUE TO WORK THOSE GOING FORWARD AND GET DEVELOPMENTS THAT HELP BENEFIT THE CITIZENS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AND SOMETHING YOU WORK FOR FROM THE TIME THEY GOT HERE, I WISH YOU GOOD LUCK, THANK YOU CAN YOU PULL HER VIDEO UP.

>> WE CAN'T SEE HER. >> I CAN SORT OF SEE HER.

>> SHE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE YOU IN A ONE ACT OF THE SAME SENTIMENTS. AND ALSO HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY HAD A IN HAPPY JUNETEENTH AS WELL.

I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING EVERYONE OUT ABOUT THE DIFFERENT COMMUNITY EVENTS THAT WE HAVE GOING ON.

VERY APPRECIATIVE TO THE CITIZENS FOR COMING OUT AND APPRECIATIVE TO THE STAFF, JAMES AND HIS ENTIRE TEAM FOR MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE GREAT COMMUNITY EVENTS TO GO TO AND PARTNERING UP WITH COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO PUT ON THE EVENTS.

A LOT OF GREAT THINGS HAPPENING IN HUTTO.

A GREAT EXPOSURE AND I REALLY HOPE EVERYBODY'S TAKING NOTE OF THE EFFORTS OF STAFF IN THE EFFORTS OF OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO PUT ON SUCH GREAT EVENTS. I HOPE YOU SUPPORT THEM AND ATTEND THESE EVENTS BUT ALSO IN ALL THE WONDERFUL THINGS

HAPPENING IN HUTTO. >> MOVING ON TO 15.2 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

I FORGOT WHAT THAT WAS. >> FROM THE EMERGENCY SERVICES DIRECTOR TO COME IN AND SAY WHAT THEY NEED AND FIND OUT NOT SUNSET IT AND WHAT IT NEEDS TO BE WILL BE DUE CHARTER REVIEW GOING FORWARD OR BY ORDINANCE OF PERMANENT BOARD AND WHATEVER THAT NEEDS TO BE AND PROTOCOLS ON EXECUTIVE SESSION IS THERE

ANY OTHER AGENDA ITEMS. >> GUIDE TO AGENDA ITEMS. THE FIRST WILL BE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO SERVING ON THE DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION THERE WAS AN INITIATIVE TO HAVE TRAINING NOT JUST FOR CITY COUNCIL BUFFER BOARDS AND COMMISSION DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION AND I WANTED TO BRING THAT BACKUP AND SEE WHAT OPTIONS THERE ARE AND IF WE NEED THE DIVERSION INCLUSION TO MAKE SOME RECOMMENDATION I THINK THAT'S MORE WORK BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE AGENDA ITEM BROUGHT BACKUP AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO BRING BACKUP AN AGENDA ITEM TO TALK ABOUT TAKING ACTION ON THE RENOVATION.

THERE WAS A PRESENTATION GIVEN TO US BY JEFF WHITE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK STAFF TO DO PRELIMINARY WORK

[02:15:09]

>> IT MIGHT TAKE THEM A COUPLE OF WEEKS BUT MORE THE END OF

JULY. >> IF YOU ARE FLEXIBLE AND SOUND SECURE WANTING TO DO THAT DURING THIS BUDGET HEARING ON THE

UPCOMING BUDGET HEARING. >> LET ME SEE WAS GOING TO TAKE IN THE FINANCIAL HOOKS TO GET NUMBERS TO MAKE IT MAY BE EASIER WITH SEPTEMBER 30 BUT THE TIME WE SELL BONDS THIS YEAR YOU MERELY BE IN NEXT YEAR. IT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN START THE WHOLE CONVERSATION A PROCESS OF WHAT TO DO.

BY THE END OF SUMMER. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANYTHING ELSE? WE WILL ADJOURN AT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.